Projectile motion sand bag drop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a sandbag dropped from a hot-air balloon, highlighting the difference between vertical and horizontal motion. Vertical acceleration is consistently 9.8 m/s², leading to an increase in vertical velocity. The horizontal velocity, however, remains constant at 12 m/s, as stated in the book, because it assumes no air resistance. The misconception arises from the expectation that horizontal velocity should decrease, but in a vacuum, it remains unchanged. This illustrates the principles of projectile motion where horizontal and vertical motions are independent of each other.
anandzoom
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
sand bag is dropped...i can understand that vertical acceleration is 9.8m/s^2...so vertical velocity increases in a.p (9.8, 19.6... m/s)...but this book says horizontal velocity of sandbag is constant and same as that of hot-air balloon (i.e., 12m/s)...I think the horizontal velocity should decrease gradually...but it doesn't...why?
 

Attachments

  • WP_20150424_18_16_20_Pro[1].jpg
    WP_20150424_18_16_20_Pro[1].jpg
    50.2 KB · Views: 465
Physics news on Phys.org
anandzoom said:
sand bag is dropped...i can understand that vertical acceleration is 9.8m/s^2...so vertical velocity increases in a.p (9.8, 19.6... m/s)...but this book says horizontal velocity of sandbag is constant and same as that of hot-air balloon (i.e., 12m/s)...I think the horizontal velocity should decrease gradually...but it doesn't...why?
The book is ignoring air resistance. Can you see that in the absence of air resistance, horizontal velocity must be constant?
 
  • Like
Likes anandzoom
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top