Projectile motion - surface of max range

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the surface of maximum range in projectile motion, specifically for a gun firing shells at speed v in cylindrical polar coordinates. The key equation derived is z = v²/(2g) - ρ²g/(2v²), which describes the maximum height (z) in relation to the radial distance (ρ). The participants emphasize the importance of conservation of energy to find the maximum height and the relationship between the angle of trajectory (θ) and the range. The final solution involves algebraic manipulation to express ρ in terms of z and θ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical polar coordinates
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with projectile motion equations
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about conservation of energy in the context of projectile motion
  • Explore the implications of varying launch angles on projectile range
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students in analytical mechanics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone studying projectile motion and its mathematical derivations.

insynC
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Doing an Analytical Mechanics course and we're just reviewing some classical physics and this question came up. Cheers for any help.

Homework Statement



A gun can fire shells in any direction with the same speed v. Ignoring air resistance and using cylindrical polar coordinates with the gun at the origin and z measured vertically up, show that the gun can hit any object inside the surface:

z = v²/(2g) - ρ²g/(2v²)

(where ρ & z are as per cylindrical coordinates)


The Attempt at a Solution



My thought was that the surface is the set of points which are the farthest the gun can reach. As such the max vertical height can be found by conservation of energy:

Max height when all vertical component of KE turned into PE.

i.e. if θ is the angle trajectory from the ground:

1/2 m (vsinθ)² = mgz

Rearranging:

z = (vsinθ)²/(2g) , which I think gives the max height the bullet will reach for a given θ. (Note that if θ = 90° => ρ = 0 gives z = v²/(2g) as per the answer).

Next I wanted to determine ρ at the max height. As the motion will be parabolic, the max height should be achieved at half of the range for a given θ.

Invoking Newton's second law and bashing through algebra an equation for z in terms of ρ can be found (by eliminating θ), and then setting z = 0 a solution for ρ(range) can be found, which when halved is ρ(max z):

ρ(max z) = 2v²/g sinθcosθ

Where I'm at

At this stage I have tried bashing these two things around a bit with little success in deriving the given result. I feel the problem shouldn't be this complicated and that I may have taken a wrong turn early on.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi insynC! :smile:
insynC said:
Next I wanted to determine ρ at the max height. As the motion will be parabolic, the max height should be achieved at half of the range for a given θ.

I feel the problem shouldn't be this complicated and that I may have taken a wrong turn early on.

Yes … you're finding the range at ground level

start again, and no short-cuts, this time! :wink:
 
Thanks for the help, it came out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K