Projectile motion with air friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding projectile motion with air resistance, specifically using a constant air friction equation. The user is struggling to obtain valid results from their calculations, despite providing initial values such as velocity, angle, mass, and diameter. They reference a website for equations and variables but initially encountered a broken link. After resolving the link issue, they express confusion about the validity of their results when substituting their initial values into the equations. The conversation highlights the challenges of accurately modeling projectile motion in fluid dynamics.
106267
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the motion of projectile motion under the influence of air resistance. A website such as this details the necessary equations available to approximate this model: http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/~michels/index_files/Golf%20Ball%20Paper%20Final%20draft.pdf
However, i am unable to calculate vaild results.
I'm using the constant air friction equation
x(t)=(24τV cosθ)/(C_D Re) e^(-((C_D Re)/24τ)t)+(24τV cosθ)/(C_D Re)
&
y(t)=〖(V sinθ+24τg/(C_D Re))( -24τ/(C_D Re) e^(-((C_D Re)/24τ)t) )+((V sinθ+24τ/(C_D Re))(24τ/(C_D Re)))-(24τ/(C_D Re))t

Reading on the linked website will provide in detail what these variables equal.

My results are
Velocity:v=2.85ms
Angle 60 degrees
mass: 0.004kg
Diameter: 0.016m
This is all done in the fluid of air
at around 20°C
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In what way are these not valid results?

[aside: the link is not valid]
 
Sorry what I'm meant to say is that my results are my initial values. When i sub these into the equation listed the results i obtain are invalid. Try the link again it should be vaild. If not just type into google search and click the most common url located
 
106267 said:
...my results are my initial values. When i sub these into the equation listed the results i obtain are invalid.
me said:
In what way are these not valid results?

However I now have the pdf linked to. Thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top