Projectile (Which Statements are true?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smart-Bunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of projectile motion, specifically the behavior of a ball at different points in its trajectory. At point A, the ball is affected by gravity and experiences downward acceleration of 10 m/s². Participants explore why the time taken from A to B differs from B to C, questioning the nature of acceleration and velocity at various points. They clarify that while the ball's vertical velocity is zero at the peak, it can still have a horizontal velocity, which remains constant if air resistance is negligible. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the principles of projectile motion and the effects of gravity on the ball's trajectory.
Smart-Bunny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, , I just want to make sure if I have done the statements right. Thank you. :)
Capture.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At point A is the ball being affected by gravity?

Why do you think from A to B takes less time than from B to C or vice versa?
 
I've counted that one of your checks is correct so far, and that you are missing two others, for a total of three checked boxes. Other members, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

So here are some questions to help you think about the problem:

1. If the ball at A is not accelerating, when does the acceleration begin? What causes the acceleration, and why would it not be constant?
2. While at the peak of a parabolic arc the ball may have a y velocity of 0, does it have no x velocity? If it were to have a velocity in the x direction, would this be greater than, less than, or equal to the initial velocity of the ball at A?
3. Why would the ball travel faster on one part of the arc than another, provided both are equal and symmetrical?
 
mrnike992 said:
I've counted that one of your checks is correct so far, and that you are missing two others, for a total of three checked boxes. Other members, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I concur.
Smart-Bunny, it isn't entirely clear from the diagram, but I would treat the trajectory shown as being merely part of a longer one. So, apart form being equidistant from B, there's nothing special about the points A and C.
 
Thanks guys! At point A the ball accelerating downwards 10 m/s2, At point B the ball accelerating downwards 10 m/s2 and at point B the speed is non-zero but less than 20 m/s :)
 
Smart-Bunny said:
Thanks guys! At point A the ball accelerating downwards 10 m/s2, At point B the ball accelerating downwards 10 m/s2 and at point B the speed is non-zero but less than 20 m/s :)
All true.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top