Proof by induction: multiplication of two finite sets.

whyme1010
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove by induction that if A and B are finite sets, A with n elements and B with m elements, then AxB has mn elements



Homework Equations


AxB is the Cartesian product. AxB={(a,b) such that a is an element of A and b is an element of B}


The Attempt at a Solution


normally, proof by induction involves one variable. here it includes two. I guess I could say that mn=nm and therefore proving it for n+1 is the same thing as proving it for m+1. Then any increase in m or n after that is just the same thing. But somehow I still feel this isn't really justifiable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whyme1010 said:

Homework Statement



prove by induction that if A and B are finite sets, A with n elements and B with m elements, then AxB has mn elements



Homework Equations


AxB is the Cartesian product. AxB={(a,b) such that a is an element of A and b is an element of B}


The Attempt at a Solution


normally, proof by induction involves one variable. here it includes two. I guess I could say that mn=nm and therefore proving it for n+1 is the same thing as proving it for m+1. Then any increase in m or n after that is just the same thing. But somehow I still feel this isn't really justifiable.

So induction has three steps. Where you assume the case n = 1, the induction assumption and then the proof for the n+1 case.

Case : n = 1 = m

Assume that A and B have one element in each corresponding set. Say A = {(a0,b0)} and B = {(c0,d0)} and go from here.
 
Last edited:
yeah, but how do I prove that if it is true for the n+1 case, it is also true for the m+1 case. and what if m+1 and n+1 are occurring at the same time?

I guess what I'm asking is, if I prove it true for the n+1 case (which is pretty easy), then how do I show that this means I can add one element to A and B as desired and the result mn would still be valid.
 
whyme1010 said:
yeah, but how do I prove that if it is true for the n+1 case, it is also true for the m+1 case. and what if m+1 and n+1 are occurring at the same time?

I guess what I'm asking is, if I prove it true for the n+1 case (which is pretty easy), then how do I show that this means I can add one element to A and B as desired and the result mn would still be valid.

That's the beauty of induction. Imagine if you held the amount of elements in B constant the whole time. Would it change your outcome?

Remember that proving something n+1 times is sufficient when thinking about this.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top