Proof by induction: multiplication of two finite sets.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving by induction that the Cartesian product of two finite sets, A with n elements and B with m elements, contains mn elements. Participants are exploring the implications of using induction with two variables rather than one.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of applying induction to two variables, questioning how to handle the cases of n+1 and m+1 simultaneously. There is an attempt to establish a base case and explore the implications of proving the statement for n+1 while considering the effect on m.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the justification of their approaches and the relationship between the variables in the induction proof. Some guidance is offered regarding the nature of induction, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by having two variables in the induction proof and express uncertainty about how to effectively demonstrate the validity of the statement when both n and m are incremented.

whyme1010
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove by induction that if A and B are finite sets, A with n elements and B with m elements, then AxB has mn elements



Homework Equations


AxB is the Cartesian product. AxB={(a,b) such that a is an element of A and b is an element of B}


The Attempt at a Solution


normally, proof by induction involves one variable. here it includes two. I guess I could say that mn=nm and therefore proving it for n+1 is the same thing as proving it for m+1. Then any increase in m or n after that is just the same thing. But somehow I still feel this isn't really justifiable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whyme1010 said:

Homework Statement



prove by induction that if A and B are finite sets, A with n elements and B with m elements, then AxB has mn elements



Homework Equations


AxB is the Cartesian product. AxB={(a,b) such that a is an element of A and b is an element of B}


The Attempt at a Solution


normally, proof by induction involves one variable. here it includes two. I guess I could say that mn=nm and therefore proving it for n+1 is the same thing as proving it for m+1. Then any increase in m or n after that is just the same thing. But somehow I still feel this isn't really justifiable.

So induction has three steps. Where you assume the case n = 1, the induction assumption and then the proof for the n+1 case.

Case : n = 1 = m

Assume that A and B have one element in each corresponding set. Say A = {(a0,b0)} and B = {(c0,d0)} and go from here.
 
Last edited:
yeah, but how do I prove that if it is true for the n+1 case, it is also true for the m+1 case. and what if m+1 and n+1 are occurring at the same time?

I guess what I'm asking is, if I prove it true for the n+1 case (which is pretty easy), then how do I show that this means I can add one element to A and B as desired and the result mn would still be valid.
 
whyme1010 said:
yeah, but how do I prove that if it is true for the n+1 case, it is also true for the m+1 case. and what if m+1 and n+1 are occurring at the same time?

I guess what I'm asking is, if I prove it true for the n+1 case (which is pretty easy), then how do I show that this means I can add one element to A and B as desired and the result mn would still be valid.

That's the beauty of induction. Imagine if you held the amount of elements in B constant the whole time. Would it change your outcome?

Remember that proving something n+1 times is sufficient when thinking about this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K