Proof by Inference: Solving p-->s w/ Rules of Inference

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostskwid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
To prove the implication p → s using the given premises p → q, (q ∧ r) → s, and r, one can apply the law of syllogism. The approach involves assuming p and demonstrating that it leads to s through the established premises. By first deriving q from p, and then using r along with q to conclude s, the proof can be completed. The discussion highlights the importance of structured reasoning in logical proofs. Overall, the method effectively utilizes rules of inference to achieve the desired conclusion.
ghostskwid
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Asked to either prove or make a counter example:

p ----> q
(q and r) ----> s
r
-------------------------------
p------> s

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble making the step to the law of syllogism I know I need to solve this. Can anyone help me with stepping this our using the rules of inference. I would greatly appreciate this thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually my first instinct when I need to prove an implication is to assume the precedent and prove the conclusion. I.e. in this case, try to prove

p \implies q
(q \wedge r) \implies s
r
p
-------------------------------
s

I think (hope) the next step is more obvious when put like this.
 
Thanks that, got the proof based on that info. :D
 
Back
Top