Proof for the greatest integer function inequality

wellorderingp
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Can anyone help me prove the greatest integer function inequality-
n≤ x <n+1 for some x belongs to R and n is a unique integer

this is how I tried to prove it-
consider a set S of Real numbers which is bounded below
say min(S)=inf(S)=n so n≤x

by the property x<inf(S) + h we have x< n+1 for some h=1
thus we get n≤ x <n+1

Is this method correct? and can I use the archimedian property to prove the above,how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you mean the following theorem:

To every real number x, there exists a unique integer n such that n ≤ x < n+1.

I don't undertand your attemped proof. What is S, and why is its supremum an integer?

It is a good idea to use the Archimedian property here: Given x, there is always an integer m such that m*1>x. Hence, there is a smallest such integer...
 
Yes,I mean that theorem.
I am not able to solve it using Archimedian property.Can you work out the entire proof please?
 
wellorderingp said:
Can you work out the entire proof please?

We don't do that in this forum. We only give hints to allow you to solve the problem on your own.

So listen to the hints and questions of Erland and see if you can come up with a proof.
 
Okay so finally I came up with something sensible

Consider a set S defined by n>x for some integer n and any real x
This set is non empty since there exist such n and x by archimedian property.
Since the set is non empty it will have a least element by wop,let that be l
So l>x since it is in S
l-1<l and it contradicts its minimality so, l-1 won't belong to S
Hence we get l-1<=x<l
= l<=x<l+1

Now is it correct?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top