Proof Help: Converting Inequality from sn ≤ M < A to |sn - A| ≥ A - M

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Stuck
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I reached the point of

sn ≤ M < A

and I need to get to

|sn - A| ≥ A - M

before I can move on and reach my final conclusion.

(Don't worry about what I'm trying to prove; just help me on this little step)

Homework Equations



Not sure because I've never worked with a 3-thing'd inequality a ≤ b < c.

The Attempt at a Solution



I mean, it's obvious looking at the problem on a number line. The steps just aren't coming to me ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that:
<br /> s_{n}-A\leqslant M-A<br />
Also
<br /> A-s_{n}\geqslant A-M<br />
What can we say from this?
 
hunt_mat said:
You know that:
<br /> s_{n}-A\leqslant M-A<br />
Also
<br /> A-s_{n}\geqslant A-M<br />
What can we say from this?

We can't say |A - sn| ≥ A - M
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top