Proof involving the Archimedean Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter pissedoffdude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Property
pissedoffdude
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If x is a real number, show that there is an integer m such that:
m≤x<m+1
Show that m is unique

Homework Equations


Archimedean Property: The set of natural numbers has no upper bound

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble with showing that m is unique. If x is a real number, I can find integers that are smaller and bigger than it. If m=x, then m≤x. By the Archimedean property, m+1>x and m+1>m, so m≤x<m+1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's fine if x happens to be an integer (that's what you imply when you say "if m= x". What if it isn't?

Whatever x is, you are correct when you say that the Archimedean property says that there exist integers larger than or equal to x. What can you say about the set of integers larger than or equal to x?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, that's fine if x happens to be an integer (that's what you imply when you say "if m= x". What if it isn't?

Whatever x is, you are correct when you say that the Archimedean property says that there exist integers larger than or equal to x. What can you say about the set of integers larger than or equal to x?

Thanks for the advice.

So if I understand correctly, we have three cases:
1) x is an integer. Then, we can say m=x
2) x is rational. Then by the Archimedean property, we an find integers that are strictly greater and less than x, so we can let m be an integer such that m=x+1/2, then m<x<m+1 and x is halfway point here
3) x is irrational, then suppose we have the interval (m, m+1) where m is an integer, we let x be an irrational number somewhere in that interval
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top