Proof of angular speed of satellite

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the orbital angular momentum of a geostationary satellite, specifically that ω² = G(M/R³), where G is the gravitational constant, M is Earth's mass, and R is the orbital radius. Participants suggest using Newton's 2nd Law to equate the gravitational force acting on the satellite with the centripetal acceleration required for circular motion. The importance of understanding circular motion and centripetal acceleration is emphasized in the context of the proof. The thread highlights the need for a clear mathematical approach to derive the equation. Overall, the conversation centers on the principles of physics necessary to validate the relationship for satellite motion.
Miklagaard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about circular motion? In particular, about centripetal acceleration?
 
Miklagaard said:

Homework Statement


http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5457/gmblrekp.th.jpg
The problem is to show that the orbital angular momentum of a geostationary satellite is given by \omega^2=G{{M}\over{R^{\,3}}}\,, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the earth, and R is the radius of the orbit.

Miklagaard said:

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Proof was asked from me. How do i proof it.

In "w^2 sub. uydu", uydu means satellite.

Use Newton's 2nd Law. Equate the gravitational force on the satellite to the product of the satellite's mass times its centripetal acceleration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculate Mass of Satellite: Step-by-Step Guide
Replies
16
Views
2K
How Does Satellite Mass Impact Velocity Change for Circular Orbit Achievement?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Physics: Circular motion and the orbital speeds of satellites
Replies
2
Views
1K
Angular Momentum Problem: Mouse walking on a rotating turntable
Replies
5
Views
1K
Criteria for Determining Satellite's Return from Orbit?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Circular orbit change after gaining mass ejected from sun
Replies
1
Views
1K
Angular momentum of a satellite
Replies
7
Views
8K
Does Time Dilation Affect Synchronized Clocks in Different Frames?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Where can you not see a satellite
Replies
4
Views
2K
Time Dilation & 2 Atomic Clocks (one in orbit)
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top