Proof of planetesimals for asteroid belt?

AI Thread Summary
Asteroid belt objects, particularly M-type asteroids, contain iron, suggesting they may be remnants of differentiated planetesimals with solidified cores. The presence of metallic meteorites indicates these bodies had cores rich in metals and silicate crusts, formed due to the heat generated by the radioactive decay of Aluminium-26. This process implies that the parent bodies of these metallic meteoroids formed shortly after the Solar System's inception, within a few million years. The total mass of the asteroid belt is estimated to be only about 4% of the Moon's mass. This evidence supports the theory of planetesimal differentiation in the early Solar System.
zankaon
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
If asteroid belt objects are in part iron, is this then consistent with such differentiated pieces being solidified remains of a liquid core(s) of previous colliding planetesimals?

p.s. total mass of asteroid belt may be just 4% of moon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
zankaon said:
If asteroid belt objects are essentially of just iron,

Hmmm...I thought I answered this.

Most asteroid belt objects are not just iron. Only the M-types.
 
zankaon said:
If asteroid belt objects are in part iron, is this then consistent with such differentiated pieces being solidified remains of a liquid core(s) of previous colliding planetesimals?

p.s. total mass of asteroid belt may be just 4% of moon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt"

Simply put, yes. More correctly the metallic meteorites are evidence of a parent body which had differentiated into metals in the core and silicates floating on top to make the crust. This was only possible while extensive amounts of Aluminium-26 was available to create sufficient heat from its radioactive decay. As Al-26 had a half-life of less than ~0.8 million years that means the parent bodies of the metallic meteoroids formed within a few million years of the formation of the Solar system.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top