Proof on Sequences: Sum of a convergent and divergent diverges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that if a sequence \( a_{n} \) converges and a sequence \( b_{n} \) diverges, then the sequence \( a_{n}+b_{n} \) also diverges. This falls under the subject area of mathematical analysis, specifically dealing with sequences and their convergence properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss a proof by contradiction approach, questioning how to demonstrate that the assumption of convergence for \( a_{n}+b_{n} \) leads to a contradiction regarding the divergence of \( b_{n} \). Some suggest using the triangle inequality to manipulate the expressions involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for refining the proof. There is an exploration of different steps and clarifications regarding the application of the triangle inequality, but no consensus has been reached on the final form of the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements for the proof structure and clarity. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the argument remains valid without leading to incorrect conclusions about the convergence of \( b_{n} \).

Heute
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove if sequence [itex]a_{n}[/itex] converges and sequence [itex]b_{n}[/itex] diverges, then the sequence [itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] also diverges.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My professor recommended a proof by contradiction. That is, suppose [itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] does converge. Then, for every ε > 0, there exists a natural number [itex]N_{1}[/itex] so that n > [itex]N_{1}[/itex] implies |[itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - L|< ε

We already know there exists [itex]N_{2}[/itex] so that n > [itex]N_{2}[/itex] implies |[itex]a_{n}[/itex] - M| < ε. So let N = max{[itex]N_{1}[/itex], [itex]N_{2}[/itex]}. Then n > N means we know [itex]a_{n}[/itex] is "very close" to M. My purpose in this is to try and show that this implies [itex]b_{n}[/itex] has a limit (that is, it converges) providing a contradiction. However, I'm not sure how to go about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the general idea !

Rewrite [itex]\left|a_n+b_n-L\right|[/itex] as [itex]\left|a_n-M+b_n-(L-M)\right|\,,[/itex] then use the triangle inequality.
 
Ah! I think I've got it.

Proof: Assume [itex]a_{n}[/itex] is convergent and [itex]b_{n}[/itex] is divergent.

Now suppose that [itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] is convergent.
Then [for every ε > 0 there exists a natural number [itex]N_{1}[/itex] so that
n > [itex]N_{1}[/itex] implies |[itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - L|< ε/2

We know by our assumption that there also exists natural number [itex]N_{2}[/itex] so that
n > [itex]N_{2}[/itex] implies |[itex]a_{n}[/itex]-M| < ε/2

Now let N = max{[itex]N_{1}[/itex],[itex]N_{2}[/itex]}
Then n > N implies
|[itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - L|< ε/2 and
|[itex]a_{n}[/itex]-M| < ε/2
So |[itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - L|+ |-([itex]a_{n}[/itex]-M)| < ε
and |[itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - [itex]a_{n}[/itex] - (L-M)| < ε
(by the triangle inequality)
But [itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - [itex]a_{n}[/itex] = [itex]b_{n}[/itex]
so this last statement implies |[itex]b_{n}[/itex] - (L-M)| < ε
which implies [itex]b_{n}[/itex] converges, which is a contradiction
Therefore, [itex]a_{n}[/itex]+[itex]b_{n}[/itex] diverges
 
Make it clear that by the triangle ineq. [itex]\left|a_n+b_n-L-a_n+M\right|\le\left|a_n+b_n-L\right|+\left|-a_n+M\right|<\varepsilon[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K