Proof that sqrt(6)-sqrt(2)-sqrt(3) is irrational

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter abruzzi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the expression \(\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{3}\) is irrational. Participants explore various methods and reasoning without reaching a consensus on a definitive proof. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and proofs related to irrational numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that \(\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}\) is irrational, using squaring as a method of proof.
  • One participant suggests using the concept of Galois fields to analyze the rationality of the expression.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for a basic proof similar to their understanding of \(\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}\) being irrational.
  • A participant attempts to manipulate the expression by squaring it but concludes that this does not lead to a definitive result.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of combining rational and irrational numbers, suggesting that the result may remain irrational.
  • Another participant proposes a polynomial approach to demonstrate the irrationality of the expression, but it is noted that this may not be straightforward.
  • One participant introduces a general idea that subtracting two irrational numbers could lead to either a rational or irrational result, emphasizing the complexity of proving such cases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a specific proof for the irrationality of \(\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{3}\). Multiple competing views and methods are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their understanding of advanced mathematical concepts such as groups and fields, which may affect their ability to engage with certain proposed proofs. Additionally, there is a recognition that proving the irrationality of the expression may involve complex reasoning that is not universally agreed upon.

abruzzi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I want to prove that \sqrt 6 - \sqrt 2- \sqrt 3 is irrational.

I already know that \sqrt 2+\sqrt 3 is irrational (by squaring it). I would like a proof that doesn't use a polynomial and the rational root theorem.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abruzzi said:
I want to proof that \sqrt 6 - \sqrt 2- \sqrt 3 is irrational.

I already know that \sqrt 2+\sqrt 3 is irrational (by squaring it). I would like a proof that doesn't use a polynomial and the rational root theorem.

Thanks.
Is \mahtbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}) Galois over Q? If so, something is rational if and only if it is equal to all of its conjugates. (The same is true if the field isn't galois... it's just that in that case, its conjugates would live in other fields)
 
Sorry, but I have no idea about groups, rings, fields, etc. I am looking for a basic proof.

For example the proof that I have that \sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3 is irrational is that, supposing it is rational, its square should also be rational. But (\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3)^2 = 5+2\sqrt6 is irrational because \sqrt 6 is irrational.

I would like to come up with a similar proof for \sqrt 6 - (\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3)
 
abruzzi said:
II already know that \sqrt 2+\sqrt 3 is irrational (by squaring it).

Hi abruzzi! :smile:

How about squaring n+\sqrt 2+\sqrt 3, for some whole number n?
 
By taking n=-1 and squaring we get 2\sqrt 6 - 2\sqrt 3 - 2\sqrt 2 + 6 = 6 + 2(\sqrt 6 -\sqrt 3-\sqrt 2)

But from this I cannot conclude anything - since knowing that number a is irrational doesn't mean that a^2 is (for example a=\sqrt 2).

Or am I not on the right path?
 
oops!

ooh, you're right! :rolleyes:

ok, let's try this:

rational + irrational = irrational.

rational x irrational = irrational.

Suppose √6 - √3 - √2 is rational.

Then (1 +√3)(1 + √2) is irrational, because it is (1 + 2√6) - (√6 - √3 - √2).

But (1 - √3)(1 - √2) is rational, because it is 1 + (√6 - √3 - √2).

So the product (1 +√3)(1 + √2)(1 - √3)(1 - √2) is irrational.

But it isn't - it's 2. :smile:
 
sqrt2 + sqrt3 = sqrt 6 + r, with r rational,

implies, by squaring both sides, that 1 + r^2 = (2-2r)sqrt6. which equates a rational and an irrational.
 
… mathwonk is cool …

:smile: ooh, mathwonk, that's much better! :smile:
 
That was exactly what I was looking for, thanks!
 
  • #10
Much nicer than mine
let x=√6-√3-√2
x³-3x²-15x-3=4√2
->x is irrational
or
let y=√323-√19-√17
y³-19y²-393y+4883=72√17
->y is irrational
mathwonks works for that too
√323=(297+y²)/(2-2y)
->y is irrational
just two was of writing m√ab
one in Z[√a,√b]
one in the field of fractions
the fraction sure give nice numbers though
 
  • #11
Well I think if you can prove that anyone of the terms is irrational, which should be easy, and if the number subtracted by it will be irrational, unless the number you subtract by is the same number or follows the same irrational pattern, which would be quite hard as it is impossible to find a pattern, thus if you were to subtract 2 irrational numbers, there should be an infinite probability that they will be irrational and rational =\.

for example you have an irrational number

.342526524525352325...n where n are the rest of the terms
-.1412413431413...n then the 2 n's would cause repeating zeros, thus being rational.

Just bringing up irrat-irrat

But there is no way to prove that at some point the rest of the digits would be the same (aka n), yet as it goes on for ever it could happen. Very weird little thing infinity =P, I'm in very low level maths, and I just wanted to contribute so this is all I could think of =], I'm sure there is a clever way to prove it though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K