Proof - Trace-preserving quantum operations are contractive

Emil_M
Messages
45
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let \mathcal{E} be a trace-preserving quantum operation. Let \rho and \sigma
be density operators. Show that <br /> D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma)) \leq D(\rho,\sigma)<br />

Homework Equations


D(\rho, \sigma) := \frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert
We can write \rho-\sigma=Q-S where Q and S are positive matrices with orthogonal support. We choose a projector P, such that <br /> D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma))=Tr(P(\mathcal{E}(\rho)-\mathcal{E}(\sigma)))<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> D(\rho, \sigma) &amp;=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert Q-S\rvert \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(Q)+Tr(S))\\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q)+\mathcal{E}(S))\\<br /> &amp;=Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q))\;\; \Big(\text{since } Tr(Q)=Tr(S) \Big) \\<br /> &amp;\geq Tr(P\mathcal{E}(Q))<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Why is the last step valid? Why can a projector never increase the trace?

Thanks for you help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say we have an operator \hat{H} with eigenbasis \{|i \rangle\}. Then we can conveniently express both the trace and the projector in terms of this eigenbasis: \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{O}] = \sum_{i} \langle i | \hat{O} | i \rangle \qquad \qquad \hat{P} = \sum_{i,j} a_{i}a_{j}^{*} |i\rangle \langle j| \quad \mathrm{where } \sum_{i} |a_{i}|^{2} = 1
Inserting these expressions into \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}] and using the fact that \hat{H} is diagonal in this basis should enable you to prove that \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}] \leq \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{H}]
 
Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top