Proofs of Boundedness for Sum and Product of Functions | Homework Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the boundedness of the sum and product of two functions, f and g, under various conditions. It explores whether the sum f + g is bounded if both functions are bounded, and whether the product fg is bounded under the same condition. The participants analyze the implications of boundedness and seek proofs or counterexamples for each statement regarding the relationships between the boundedness of the functions and their sum or product. Key points include the definitions of boundedness and the need for additional steps in proofs to establish inequalities. The conversation emphasizes the importance of rigor in mathematical proofs related to these concepts.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Let f and g be functions from R to R. For the sum and product of f and g, determine which statements below are true. If true, provide a proof; if false, provide a counterexample.

a) If f and g are bounded, then f + g is bounded
b) If f and g are founded, then fg is bounded
c) If f+g is bounded, then f and g are bounded
d) If fg is bounded, then f and g are bounded

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



"Bounded" just means in the real-numbered set S there is a real number M such that |x|≤M for all x in S.

So, say F is the max for f and G is the max for G.

For example, say f(x)=5-x2 and g(x)=6-x2. F=5, S=6.

f(x) + g(x) = 11-2x2.

Still bounded, of course. But how do I give proofs of all these? Give me an example or two.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly as you said. Consider (a). If f is bounded by F and g is bounded by G, that means for all x in R, |f(x)| ≤ F and |g(x)| ≤ G. So, |(f+g)(x)| = |f(x)+g(x)| ≤ ? ≤ M. What is M and what goes in the question mark? That is how such a proof would go.
 
Tedjn said:
Exactly as you said. Consider (a). If f is bounded by F and g is bounded by G, that means for all x in R, |f(x)| ≤ F and |g(x)| ≤ G. So, |(f+g)(x)| = |f(x)+g(x)| ≤ ? ≤ M. What is M and what goes in the question mark? That is how such a proof would go.

M = G + F

Not sure about the question mark
 
True, M = G + F, but you cannot just directly conclude |f(x)+g(x)| ≤ G + F. There needs to be an additional step in there, which is the question mark. Remember the definition of F and G.
 
No, if f(x) is bounded then there exist M such that |f(x)|< M. If g(x) is bounded, there exist N such that |g(x)|< N.

Now, |f(x)+ g(x)|\le |f(x)|+|g(x)|&lt; what?

|f(x)g(x)|\le |f(x)||g(x)|&lt; what?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top