Proofs regarding inequalities and number line stuff

mscbuck
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"There is a very useful way of describing the points of the closed interval [a,b] (where we assume, as usual, that a < b)

a. Consider the interval [0,b]. Prove that if x is in [0,b] then x = tb for some t with 0 <= t <= 1. What is the significance of the number t? What is the mid-point of the interval [0,b]

b. Now prove that if x is in [a,b], then x = (1-t)a + tb for some t with 0 <= t <= 1. Hint: Can also be written as a + t(b-a). What is the midpoint of the interval [a,b]? What is the point 1/3 of the way from a to b?

c. Prove, conversely, that if 0 <= t <= 1, then (1-t)a + tb is in [a,b]

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm really close and I'm just missing something extremely stupid. I solved part a like so
0 <= x <= b
0/b <= x/b <= b/b
0 <= x/b <= 1
Let x/b = t
0 <= t <= 1

I'm stuck on part b however. No matter how many times I did the algebra I just never could come up with the right equation. I assume to start out like this:
a <= x <= b
a/b <= x/b <= b/b
Let x/b = t
a/b <= t <= 1
a <= tb <= b
From here I'm somewhat stuck. I see that "tb" is part of the equation I"m looking for, I just need a (1-t)a from there.

I also think I have solved c:
0 <= t <= 1
0 * (b-a) <= t * (b-a) <= 1 (b-a)
0 <= t(b-a) <= b -a
a <= a + t(b-a) <= b

Thanks for all of your help in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For (b), given interval [a, b], consider instead the interval [0, b-a]. You have, in part (a) shown that any point, x, in that interval, can be written in the form x= t(b- a) for some t between 0 and 1. Now "shift" that to put x between a and b.
(You are looking at b/a. Look at b- a instead.)
 
Thanks HallsofIvy!

Now I am on part d.) which states: The points of the OPEN interval (a,b) are those of the form (1-t)a + tb for 0 < t < 1.

Is there anything that is different about approaching this problem because of an open interval?
 
No difference at all. Except, of course, since t= 0 gives a and t= 1 gives b, you have to drop those values.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top