Propagating planar wave of the Coulomb potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the propagation of a planar wave of the Coulomb potential, represented as φ = sin(kx - ωt), while assuming a constant magnetic potential A. The participant calculates the electric field E, magnetic field B, current density J, and charge density ρ, ultimately finding that the results imply a non-physical scenario where charge density travels at the speed of light. They conclude that the setup of the problem may be inherently flawed, as a constant magnetic potential cannot exist alongside the described electric field configuration. The analysis reveals that Maxwell's equations may not fully account for the complexities of this situation, leading to the assertion that the results obtained are inconsistent with physical reality.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



There is a propagating planar wave of the Coulomb potential, \phi = sin(kx - \omega t). What other fields result when it is assume the magnetic potential, \textbf{A} is everywhere constant?

\phi, Coulomb potential
\textbf{B}, magnetic field strength
\textbf{E}, electric field strength
\textbf{A}, magnetic potential
\textbf{J}, current density
c, speed of light in a vacuum
\rho, charge density

Homework Equations



\nabla\times\textbf{B} - (1/c) \partial \textbf{E} / \partial t = \textbf{J}
\nabla \cdot \textbf{E} = \rho
\nabla\times\textbf{E} + (1/c) \partial \textbf{B} / \partial t = \textbf{0}
\nabla \cdot \textbf{B} = 0 ,
where
\textbf{E} = - \nabla \phi - (1/c) \partial \textbf{A} / \partial t
\textbf{B} = \nabla \times \textbf{A}
and
\omega/k = c .

The Attempt at a Solution



Starting with
\phi = sin(kx - \omega t) , and \textbf{A} = \textbf{0} ,
I get
\textbf{E} = -kx\ cos(kx - \omega t)
\textbf{B} = \textbf{0}
\textbf{J} = (-k \omega /c) sin(kx- \omega t)
\rho = k^2 sin(kx- \omega t) .

But in each case the velocity of propagation is c=\omega/k. This includes nonzero charge density \rho traveling at c, so I came up with a nonphysical solution. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There was no intent to be misleading, but the problem is my own--not a school problem. That's exceptable under the guidelines, right?

I think the problem set-up itself must be nonphysical. That is, \phi = sin(kx - \omega t) with \textbf{A} = \textbf{0} can't exist alone somehow.

It's easy to see how one could generate fairly planar waves in Phi between the plates of two capacitors. But a changing electric field over time, as it oscillates, would produce a corresponding B magnetic field that runs in hoops around the centerline of the capacitor.

I dunno, but perhaps there is no physical way to apply an additional oscillating magnetic field so that \textbf{B}_{cap} + \textbf{B}_{additional} = \textbf{0} over at least some small region.

I don't think one could prove it one way or the other.
 
Last edited:
\textbf{REGRESSION_{REGRESSION}}
 
I see no one cares to solve this, so I'll just clean-up the math and logical errors.

The Attempt at a Solution



For a planar wave in \phi (assumed propagating in the x-direction),

\phi = sin(kx - \omega t) \hat{\textbf{i}} .

\textbf{E} = - \nabla\phi
E_{x} = - \partial \phi / \partial x \ \ \ \ \ \ E_{y} = 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ E_{z} = 0
\textbf{E} = E_{x} \hat{\textbf{i}}
\textbf{E} = -k \ cos(kx - \omega t)\hat{\textbf{i}}

From \nabla\times\textbf{B} - (1/c) \partial \textbf{E} / \partial t = \textbf{J} and \textbf{B} = \textbf{0} :

\textbf{J} = - (1/c) \partial \textbf{E} / \partial t
\textbf{J} = (k \omega /c) sin(kx- \omega t)
\textbf{J} = sin(kx- \omega t)

From \nabla \cdot \textbf{E} = \rho:

\nabla \cdot \textbf{E} = \partial E_{x} / \partial x

\rho = k^2 sin(kx- \omega t)

4. An attempt at analysis

\nabla\times\textbf{E} = 0
so that
(1/c) \partial \textbf{B} / \partial t = \textbf{0}

This means that the requirement that the magnetic field be zero is consistent.

My original analysis was wrong. There are no hoops of magnetic field generated when the capacitor plate is uniformly charged. Obtained is a non-physical result.

I am left to conclude that maxwell's equations of electromagnetism, based upon a 4-vector potential, are incomplete.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top