What is the role of the i in the propagator of Feynman rules?

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0
I'm probably missing something small but I haven't been able to figure this out. In the Feynman rules (for a scalar field that obeys the Klein-Gordon equation), you write a propagator for internal lines as

<br /> \frac{i}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.<br />

The propagator integrand is originally

<br /> \frac{e^{i k (x-y)}}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.<br />

Since we're dealing with an internal line, both exponentials, in x and y, are integrated out to delta functions, leaving you with

<br /> \frac{1}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.<br />

That I see, but where does the i in the numerator of the first expression above come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This factor i comes from the i in the path-integral formula for the generating functional for (connected Green's functions), W[J]=\ln Z[J] with

Z[J]=\int \mathcal{D} \phi \exp[\mathrm{i} \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x [\mathcal{L}(\phi,\partial \phi)+J \phi]].
 
Ah, I think I got it. I had ignored the factor i when I wrote things down as Wick contractions. Thanks.
 
Chapter 10 of Srednicki is a good way to see the Feynman rules emerge, including this factor of i.
 
He seems to adopt quite a different approach than the author of the book I'm using. I may have a look at that later. Thanks for the tip.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top