Propagator/transition amplitude through intermediate integrations

  • Thread starter Thread starter omg!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
omg!
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

suppose i want to calculate the propagator/transition amplitude which i can write as follows:

(a,T|-a,-T)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx_1\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx_2(a,T|x_1,T_1)(x_1,T_1|x_2,T_2)(x_2,T_2|-a,-T).

the situation is this:
i already have an approximation of (a,T_{i-1}|-a,T_i) which is qualitively different from (a,T|-a,-T), so that i can't simply calculate the latter by changing the time variable in the first expression. but i think it should be possible to use this information somehow to obatin the complete propagator. the problem is that i don't know how to deal with the intermediate integrations.

any help would be greatly appreciated.

(i'm using the path integral formalism for the calculation)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The infinitesmal amplitudes can be exponentiated, since 1 + \epsilon \approx e^{\epsilon}. Once inside the exponential, you have a sum instead of a product. An analogous calculation is done here: http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_mechanics/path_integral
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lbrits said:
The infinitesmal amplitudes can be exponentiated, since 1 + \epsilon \approx e^{\epsilon}. Once inside the exponential, you have a sum instead of a product. An analogous calculation is done here: http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_mechanics/path_integral

hi, thanks again for your response!

sorry for my ignorance, but i couldn't find anything that would help in the link you provided. could you tell me where to look, or elaborate further?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, it isn't really clear what you're doing, but I hazard a guess that it has to do with path integrals :)

Specifically, the derivation of G(q_{j+1}, t_{j+1}; q_j, t_j) that casts it in the form:
G(q_{j+1}, t_{j+1}; q_j, t_j) \approx \int\!\frac{dp_j}{2\pi}e^{\frac{i}{\hbar} \left[ p_j (q_{j+1}-q_j) - H(p_j, \bar{q}_j)\delta t \right]}.
 
hmm, that looks like some discretized version of the path integral.

what I'm trying to do is to write the expression in my first post into something like

(a,T|-a,-T)=C\prod_{n=1}^N(a,T_{n-1}|-a,T_n)

because i already know much about (a,T_{n-1}|-a,T_n).
 
What approximation do you already have?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top