I Proper time to reach the singularity of a Schwarschild black hole

Reggid
Messages
45
Reaction score
53
TL;DR Summary
I have a question on how to calculate the proper time to reach the singularity of a Schwarzschild black hole using Schwarzschild coordinates.
When calculating the proper time along a timelike radial geodesic, with the initial condition that object the starts at rest at some Schwarzschild coordinate ##r_0>r_S##, i.e.
\frac{\mathrm{d}r}{\mathrm{d}\tau}\Bigg|_{r=r_0}=0\;,
after using the equations of motion one finds
\mathrm{d}\tau=-\mathrm{d}r\,\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_0-r}}\;.
So the proper time to fall down to some Schwarzschild coordinate ##r<r_0## is
\tau (r)=-\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}\int_{r_0}^{r}\mathrm{d}r^\prime\,\sqrt{\frac{r^\prime}{r_0-r^\prime}}=\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}\biggl(\sqrt{r(r_0-r)}+r_0\cosh ^{-1}\Bigl(\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_0}}\Bigr)\biggr)\;.
From this result one can see that the proper time to reach the event horizon ##\tau(r=r_S)## is finite.

I know that until here everything is fine, but the above integral is also perfectly finite for ##r=0##, such that the proper time to reach the singularity is
\tau(r=0)=\frac{\pi r_0^{3/2}}{2r_S^{1/2}}\;.
Now my question is: is this calculation also reliable beyond the horizon?
On the one hand everything is finite and everything is expressed in terms of invariant proper time (no reference to coordinate time ##t## that diverges at the horizon is needed).
But on the other hand I know that Schwarzschild coordinates only describe the patch of spacetime that lies outside the horizon, so maybe one would first have to go to coordinates that can be extended to the region beyond the horizon to be able to derive that result.
I have the feeling that the result could be correct, but still the way I obtained it is somewhat "sloppy" or not not really OK.

Can somebody help?

Thanks for any answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It works because ##r## is definable all the way in (it's the areal radius of the spherical shells reflecting the symmetry of the spacetime), so ##dr/d\tau## is defined everywhere. I agree that using the Schwarzschild coordinate expression of the geodesic equation to get to that point is a bit sketchy because the coordinates don't work at the horizon (although they work above and below it).

I've not done this myself, but I think that formally you could translate everything into a coordinate system that does work at the horizon - e.g. Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates. Since they share a definition of the radial coordinate, ##r##, with Schwarzschild coordinates, that ought to give you the same ##dr/d\tau##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Reggid
Thank you for your answer.

Yes you are right, using Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates it is actually very easy to see that they give you the same expression for ##\mathrm{d}r/\mathrm{d}\tau## (as they should).
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis and Ibix
Reggid said:
So the proper time to fall down to some Schwarzschild coordinate ##r<r_0## is
\tau (r)=-\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}\int_{r_0}^{r}\mathrm{d}r^\prime\,\sqrt{\frac{r^\prime}{r_0-r^\prime}}=\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}\biggl(\sqrt{r(r_0-r)}+r_0\cosh ^{-1}\Bigl(\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_0}}\Bigr)\biggr)\;.
From this result one can see that the proper time to reach the event horizon ##\tau(r=r_S)## is finite.

I'm not sure this integral is good.

##\cosh^{-1}(x)## is only real valued if x>1, but ##r/r_0## is <1

The equation to be integrated passes the sanity check that ##\frac{dr}{d\tau} = \sqrt{E^2 - 1 + 2M/r} = \sqrt{E^2-1 + r_s/r}## for some constant E, but I've got my doubts about the integration process.
 
  • Like
Likes Reggid
pervect said:
I'm not sure this integral is good.

cosh−1⁡(x) is only real valued if x>1, but r/r0 is <1

The equation to be integrated passes the sanity check that drdτ=E2−1+2M/r=E2−1+rs/r for some constant E, but I've got my doubts about the integration process.

That's because it should be a ##\cos^{−1}##, not a ##\cosh^{−1}##.

Sorry for the typo (and thanks for finding it)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top