B Is an Electron Both a Wave and a Particle Simultaneously?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Deepak K Kapur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Properties
Deepak K Kapur
Messages
164
Reaction score
5
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the same time: all the time
 
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, QuantumQuest and Delta2
vanhees71 said:
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).

Then what is it? Just probability!
 
Deepak K Kapur said:
Then what is it?
It is neither a wave nor a particle. It is a quantum object.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
vanhees71 said:
An electron is neither a classical particle nor a classical field but described entirely right only by modern quantum theory, which implies that there is no such thing as "wave-particle duality" as in old quantum theory (which was obsolete with the discovery of modern quantum theory in 1925/26).

Nugatory said:
It is neither a wave nor a particle. It is a quantum object.

Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
 
If you could ask an electron what it is, I bet it would answer like Popeye the Sailor:

IAmWhatIAm.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory and Delta2
The heavies (i.e. the theoretical physicists like vanH and Nu) are absolutely right. But for many down-to-earth 'practical' physics, treating the buggers as particles or treating them as waves can be quite adequate. If you are describing something that forces you to switch between these interpretations you are probably in trouble. The electrons themselves certainly don't change their behaviour because you use the one or the other paradigm to describe their behaviour.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Deepak K Kapur said:
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?

I'll add to the fun. In my field, we treat them like classical particles. And it works!

Look at particle-simulation codes such as PARMELA, and other PIC codes. They all threat electrons as classical particles to model the electron beam going through various components in a particle accelerator.

Your question is ambiguous because you did not put ANY context to it. If you ask someone if Special Relativity is valid in building a house, you'll get laughed at. There are cases where it is easier to treat something in some formulation, while in others, it may be more accurate to treat it in another formulation.

I also strongly suggest you read some of the FAQs, especially on the similar question regarding photons, and whether they are waves or particles. The answer is applicable to this one. Notice the fact that even calling it a "wave" or a "particle" is incorrect or inaccurate at best. YOU have already a classical imprint in your head of what a "particle" is and what a "wave" is. Yet, these are not accurate description of quantum particles, simply because they are not physical waves (meaning they are not really "waves") and they really do not have well-defined boundary in space like a ping-pong ball (meaning they are not really "particles").

So even the insistence that they can be one or the other, or combination of both is not accurate either!

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest
  • #10
Delta² said:
Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
For electrons (and other massive particles, as opposed to photons) you don't need QFT. Ordinary "first-quantization" non-relativistic QM, the stuff you'll learn in a college-level intro to QM, is a good enough starting point.

Some interactions with an electron demonstrate interference and diffraction, which we generally consider to be wave-like behavior; other interactions are consistent with the electron being at a particular place at a particular time, which we generally consider to be particle-like behavior. As ZapperZ has pointed out, in many problems you can just choose one or the other model and stick with it and get altogether satisfactory results.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest and BvU
  • #11
Deepak K Kapur said:
An electron displays both wave and particle like properties.

Does it exhibit these at the same time or at different times?

Instantaneously, of course. :biggrin:
 
  • #12
DrChinese said:
Instantaneously, of course. :biggrin:

This word 'instantaneous' has confused many a generation, imo.
 
  • #13
I always thought the standard answer is that depending on the experiment you can interpret the electron as particle and in others as wave.

Although there is the controversial experiment by Afshar which interprets as both at the same time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afshar_experiment
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #14
Delta² said:
Oh come on Vanhees and Nugatory please tell us something more about what the modern quantum field theory says about electron!
An electron and its antiparticle, the positron, are described as a Dirac fermion with the mass of ~511 keV. It carries electric and weak-isospin charge but no color. That describes completely what we know about the electron within the Standard Model of elementary particles.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba

Similar threads

Back
Top