Protein pH titration (Henderson-Hasselbalch)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the pH of a histidine solution after adding 2.5 moles of NaOH per mole of amino acid, with known pKa values for its functional groups. Participants express confusion over the wording of the problem, particularly regarding the assumption that all acid-base groups are protonated, which complicates the application of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The conversation highlights the need to consider the stoichiometry of the reaction and how to approach the problem as a triprotic acid similar to phosphoric acid. There is a consensus that the final pH cannot be accurately determined without clarifying the initial conditions and the extent of protonation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precise language in chemistry problems to avoid misinterpretation.
physicsstudent14
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solution of histidine has all acid-base groups protonated. The pKa of the carboxy group is 1.8, the amino group is 9.2, and the side chain is 6.0. For each mole of amino acid, 2.5 moles of NaOH are added. What is the pH of the solution?

Homework Equations



Henderson-Hasselbalch equation: pH = pKa + log ([A-]/[HA])

The Attempt at a Solution



I am trying to answer this question for a practice exam. I know that the base will deprotonate the protein, starting from the carboxy group followed by the side chain. I assume that the NaOH is very basic, so it will definitely cause a pH of greater than 6.0. How do I proceed from there?

My attempt: pH = unknown
pKa = 1.8, 6.0, 9.2
[A-]/[HA] = 2.5

pH = 9.2 + log(2.5) = 9.59, but this is wrong.

Could someone please help me with this problem. Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Honestly - no idea how to solve the question. The most obvious approach will be to calculate initial pH and continue from there, just calculating stoichiometry and NaOH excess. However...

A solution of histidine has all acid-base groups protonated.

This is not a quantitative statement. All groups are protonated - no matter wht pH is, it is just a matter of where the equilibrium lies. At pH 10 there is one caroboxylic group protonated for every 108 molecules, at pH 0.8 there is one NOT protonated carboxylic group for evey nine protonated.

Could be they want us to assume molecule like H3Histidine3+ that reacts with excess base. That's wrong, as such protonated molecule will exist only in the presence of huge excess of strong acid, which can't be ignored when calculating final concentration of the base.

So - either I have not yet waken up, or the question has no solution as worded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to my professor, adding alkali neutralizes protons so that...
Adding 0.5 mol of alkali will give a pH of the carboxyl group pKa = 1.8
Adding 1.0 mol of alkali will give a pH between 1.8 and 6.0
Adding 1.5 mol of alkali will give a pH of the histidine group side chain pKa = 6.0
Adding 2.0 mol of alkali will give a pH between 6.0 and 9.2
Adding 2.5 mol of alkali will give a pH of the amino group pKa = 9.2
Adding 3 mol of alkali will fully deprotonate the histidine.

I'm confused as to how he go the 0.5 mol increments of alkali.
 
Take a look at the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation - at pH=pKa acid is exactly 50% neutralized ([HA]=[A-]).

Trick is - while he is right about neutralization stoichiometry, he still has no idea what the final pH is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Treat the hisitidine exactly as you would treat a phosphoric acid buffer problem (H3PO4). Histidine can be though of as a triprotic acid in this example.

Have you done any problems using phosphoric acid in a like manner? For example, what would the pH be for a phosphoric acid solution that has had 2.5 equivalents of NaOH added? The pKa's are different but not the approach.

Borek, I know you know how to do this problem!
 
chemisttree said:
Have you done any problems using phosphoric acid in a like manner?

Borek, I know you know how to do this problem!

What I don't like about the question, is the wording.

Would you say that phosphoric acid in its solution is fully protonated? 0.1M solution has pH around 1.6 - that means around 25% is in the form of H2PO4-. Perhaps that's nitpicking, but I still don't like it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top