Proton-Antiproton Annihilation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation
Skatch
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton and antiproton at rest in an S-state annihilate to produce \pi0\pi0 pairs. Show
that this reaction cannot be a strong interaction.

Homework Equations



I interpret this problem as:

p + p_bar -> \pi0 + \pi0

The Attempt at a Solution



If this were a strong interaction, Parity should be conserved, yes? I think that in the annihilation
described above, parity is not being conserved.But really, my first question is, am I interpreting it correctly? Is the annihiliation producing \pi0 + \pi0?
Or is it producing \pi0 + \pi0 + \pi0 + \pi0? Not sure what they mean by "\pi0\pi0 pairs".Then my next question is, what is the Parity of p_bar?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, so I think I've come to the conclusion that the Parity of the antiproton is -1.
I read that, in general, P(fermion * antifermion) = -1, and since proton's parity is +1, I'm
going to conclude that parity of the antiproton is -1.

Okay, so total parity on the left hand side of the equation is 0.

But I still don't know if I'm interpreting the problem correctly. Is the annihilation producing:

\pi0 + \pi0 ?

\pi0 + \pi0 + \pi0 + \pi0 ?

\pi0\pi0 ?

\pi0\pi0 + \pi0\pi0 ?

Pardon the ignorance here. I'm taking this Nuclear Physics class despite not meeting some
of the pre-reqs. I'm a math major that was just interested in the material, so I'm a bit
behind.

Thanks for any help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top