Proton Deflection when traversing a a Parallel-plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
A parallel-plate capacitor with specified dimensions and surface charge densities is analyzed for the deflection of a proton traveling between its plates. The kinetic energy of the proton is calculated using the formula Ek=(1/2)mv^2, yielding a value of 1.67x10^-21J. The discussion suggests that a kinematic approach, rather than energy methods, may be more effective for solving the deflection problem. It is recommended to use Coulomb's Law to determine the acceleration of the proton due to the electric field. The focus is on applying the correct physics principles to find the sideways deflection as the proton exits the capacitor.
Colton1995
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel-plate capacitor has 4.0cm × 4.0cm electrodes with surface charge densities ±1.0×10^−6C/m2. A proton traveling parallel to the electrodes at 2.0×10^6m/s enters the center of the gap between them.
Part A
By what distance has the proton been deflected sideways when it reaches the far edge of the capacitor? Assume the field is uniform inside the capacitor and zero outside the capacitor.


Homework Equations


Ek=(1/2)mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for the kinetic energy using the above equation, Ek=(1/2)(1.67x10^-27kg)(2.0x10^6m/s = 1.67x10^-21J.
I'm pretty sure that I'm suppose to split it up into x and y variables to solve for delta y, but I am completely stuck. I would normally look at the answer and try to work it out from there but I am doing extra practice questions for review for my final and my prof. hasn't posted the answers yet. I'm not looking for an answer, but rather a push in the right direction. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think using energy is the way to solve this problem. I would suggest just a simple kinematic approach using Coulomb's Law.
 
By using acceleration formula with electric field.
a= (P x E) / m
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top