Prove 2^n possibly with the binomial theorem

gap0063
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Prove for all n\inN
2n= (\stackrel{n}{0})+(\stackrel{n}{1})+...+(\stackrel{n}{n})

So I used mathematical induction

base case: n=0 so 20=1 and (\stackrel{0}{0})=1

induction step: Let n\inN be given, assume as induction hypothesis that 2n= (\stackrel{n}{0})+(\stackrel{n}{1})+...+(\stackrel{n}{n})

I think I'm trying to prove 2n+1= (\stackrel{n+1}{0})+(\stackrel{n+1}{1})+...+(\stackrel{n+1}{n})


but I don't know how to apply the binomial theorem (if I'm even supposed to!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is really a combinatorics problem.

Think about how many ways there are to pick a subset out of a set of n elements.
 
Office_Shredder said:
This is really a combinatorics problem.

Think about how many ways there are to pick a subset out of a set of n elements.

I don't understand... :/
 
Yes, use the binomial theorem! Let x= y= 1 in (x+ y)^n.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top