Prove Cauchy Sequence: {sn} from {tn}

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if the sequence {tn} is a Cauchy sequence, then the sequence {sn} is also a Cauchy sequence. The proof begins by applying the definition of a Cauchy sequence, establishing that for sufficiently large n and m, the difference |tn - tm| is less than a specified epsilon. It demonstrates that the sum of the absolute differences |an| + |an-1| + ... + |am+1| is bounded by epsilon, leading to the conclusion that |sn - sm| is also less than epsilon. The use of the triangle inequality reinforces this result, confirming that {sn} is indeed a Cauchy sequence. Overall, the proof is validated, and there is a request for assistance with LaTeX formatting for summation notation.
tink
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Let {an}(n goes from 1 to infinity) be a sequence. For each n define:
sn=Summation(j=1 to n) of aj
tn=Summation(j=1 to n) of the absolute value of aj.

Prove that if
{tn}(n goes from 1 to infinity)
is a Cauchy sequence, then so is
{sn}(n goes from 1 to infinity).


I started this proof with the definition of a Cauchy sequence. Pick an N large enough so that n,m>N makes
|an - am| < epsolon.
So if tn is Cauchy, we have
|tn-tm| < epsolon.
tn-tm = summation|an|-summation|am| = |an|+|an-1|+...+|am+1|
so now
|an| + |an-1| +...+ |am+1| < epsolon
but
|an + an-1 + ... + am+1| < |an|+|an-1|+...+|am+1|
by triangle inequality.
so now
|an + an-1 +...+ am+1| < epsolon
but
|an + an-1 + ... + am+1| = |sn - sm|
so now
|sn-sm| < epsolon, and therefore Cauchy.


Can anybody tell me if this makes sence? Or at least tell me how to write out "summation from n=1 to infinity" on here in symbols? Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a thread on \LaTeX somewhere around here...
s_n=\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_i

The proof looks ok too.
 
Thank you SOOO much!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top