Prove function continuous at only one point

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the function f(x) = x for rational x and f(x) = -x for irrational x is continuous only at 0. Participants express confusion about the proof's reasoning for discontinuity at points other than 0, particularly regarding the use of sequences converging to a point 'a'. It is clarified that to demonstrate discontinuity, one must find a sequence converging to 'a' where the limits of f(xk) yield different results. The approach involves examining two sequences converging to 'a' that produce distinct limits when applying the function, thereby contradicting the definition of continuity. Ultimately, this establishes that f is not continuous at any point a ≠ 0.
cmajor47
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the function defined as f(x)= x when x is rational and -x when x is irrational is only continuous at 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have been looking at this website which proves this:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/FunctionContinuousAtOnlyOnePoint.html

I don't understand how the writer proves that the function is not continuous when a\neq0.
Why do they take xk= to something? How does this help them show that the limits equal a and -a.
How does showing that prove that f is not continuous at a?

I know those are a lot of question, but maybe an answer to even just the first ones would help me understand this proof.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you agree that
"f is continuous at a, if for all sequences xk that converge to a, f(xk) converges to f(a)" ?

So then to show that f is not continuous at a, all you need is to find one sequence that does converge to a but for which the limit of the f(xk) is not f(a). (The negation of "for all sequences S, P(S)" is "there exists a sequence S such that not P(S)").

So what they do is take two different sequences which both have limit a, and show that when you apply f first and take the limit, you get two different results. Since f(a) cannot be equal to a and -a at the same time, at least one of this sequence forms a counter-example to the statement of continuity they start out with.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K