Prove Inequality: 3(ab+bc+ac)/abc + 6abc + 15 ≥ 27

  • Thread starter Thread starter LanNguyen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality involving positive real numbers a, b, and c, specifically the expression 3(ab + ac + bc)/abc + 6abc + 15 ≥ 27. Participants explore methods to demonstrate the inequality, including rewriting it in terms of symmetric functions and analyzing its equality condition, which occurs at a = b = c = 2. Suggestions include using polynomial roots and geometric interpretations to gain insights into the inequality's structure. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of proving the inequality and the significance of understanding when equality holds. Overall, the thread seeks collaborative input on tackling this mathematical challenge.
LanNguyen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Pls help me to prove the following inequality:

\begin{align*}
3 \left(\dfrac{a}{b} + \dfrac{b}{a} + \dfrac{b}{c} + \dfrac{c}{b} + \dfrac{a}{c} + \dfrac{c}{a}\right) &+ \left( 1 + a\right) \left( 1+b \right)\left( 1+c \right)\left(\dfrac{c}{b}+\dfrac{c}{a} \right) \left( \dfrac{b}{a}+\dfrac{b}{c} \right) \left( \dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{a}{c} \right) \\ & \geq 6abc+6+9(ab+bc+ac+a+b+c)+3\left( \dfrac{ab}{c} +\dfrac{bc}{a}+\dfrac{ac}{b}\right)
\end{align*}
with ##a, b, c## are positive reals

If it helps, I know the equality occurs when ##a=b=c=2## (although I'm not sure if it's the only one).

Also, can anyone helps to prove ##(2, 2, 2)## is the only point at which equality occurs.

Thanks a lot...

Any hint is appreciated...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With ##f(a,b,c) = a^2b+a^2c+ab^2+ac^2+b^2c+bc^2## and ##g(a,b,c)=a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2## we can write the inequality as
$$
3 (f(a,b,c)-g(a,b,c)) +3a^2b^2c^2+3abc \geq (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(7g(a,b,c)-f(a,b,c))
$$
With ##P_0=abc\, , \,P_1= (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)## and ##P_2=(a+b)(a+c)(b+c)## we get
$$
P_2(3+P_1) \geq 3g(a,b,c) -3P_0^2+3P_0+9P_0P_1
$$
and if we write ##g(a,b,c) =3P_0Q_3\, , \,P_2=3P_0Q_2\, , \,P_1=Q_1## and ##Q_0=P_0=abc## we have
$$
Q_2Q_1\geq -2Q_2+3Q_1+(Q_3-Q_0+1)
$$
with symmetric functions ##Q_i##. The inequality now looks like a conic section. Maybe normalizing it gets a geometric intuition.

Another idea is to write the entire inequality in terms of the elementary symmetric functions:
##a+b+c\, , \,ab+bc+ac\, , \,abc## which are the coefficients in ##p(x)=(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)##. The statement then is about the zeroes of this polynomial.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top