I Prove Inequality: A,A', B, B' in [0,1]

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevendaryl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,954
I'm pretty sure that the following is true, but I don't see an immediate compelling proof, so I'm going to throw it out as a challenge:

Let A,A', B, B' be four real numbers, each in the range [0,1]. Show that:

AB + AB' + A'B \leq A' B' + A + B

(or show a counter-example, if it's not true)

This inequality was inspired by Bell's Theorem, but that's not relevant to proving or disproving it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the region ##A+A' \leq 1## first.
For B=0, the inequality simplifies to ##AB' \leq A'B'+A## which is true.
The derivatives with respect to B are ##A+A'## and ##1##, respectively, which means the derivative for the left hand side is smaller or equal. For the chosen region this means the inequality stays true for all B.

Now consider the region ##A+A' > 1##.
For B=1, the inequality simplifies to ##AB'+A' \leq A'B'+1##. As ##B'+A' \leq A'B'+1##, this inequality is satisfied.
The derivatives with respect to B are ##A+A'## and ##1##, respectively, for the chosen region the derivative on the left hand side is larger, but now we are going backwards with B. For the chosen region this means the inequality stays true for all B.For ##A=1-A'##, the inequality can be written as ##AB+AB'+(1-A)B \leq (1-A)B'+A+B## which simplifies to ##2AB' \leq B'+A##, that inequality does not depend on B and it is true with enough margin to make the derivatives work on both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes stevendaryl
Thanks! That's a little more elegant than the only way I found to prove it, which was to do an exhaustive case split.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top