Prove Infinitely Many Points w/ Equal Dist from x,y in Euclidean Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean
jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



Suppose n \geq 3, x,y\in\mathbb{R}^n, ||x-y||=d>0 and r>0. Prove that if 2r>d, there are infinitely many z\in\mathbb{R}^n such that ||x-z||=||y-z||=r.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I figure that no matter how large we choose n, it should always be possible to reduce the problem to the case when n=3. Since we just have two points in \mathbb{R}^n, these can just be represented by a one dimensional line. Then, we can always cut the line at (x-y)2^{-1} with a plane which is perpendicular to x-y. Clearly, any point on this plane is at an equal distance from x and y; moreover, there must be some circle on this plane such that all the points on that circle are a distance of r from x.

However, this reasoning is really informal (and not necessarily correct) so I was wondering if I could formalize this idea or if I'm approaching this problem with the completely wrong mindset (I think that I probably am). Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jgens said:
However, this reasoning is really informal (and not necessarily correct)!

You can formalize it by writing explicitly, in Cartesian coordinates, the equations for your orthogonal hyperplane (it does not to be just 2-dimensional at this point). Then you write additional equations for the distance. Then you manipulate with algebra showing that for n>2 these equations always have infinitely many solutions. For this it will be enough to select two linearly independent vectors in the orthogonal hyperplane.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top