Prove Invertibility of Square Matrix A & ATA

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamsmooth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the invertibility of a square matrix A and its product with its transpose, ATA. The participants are exploring the relationship between the invertibility of A and ATA, particularly focusing on determinants as a key concept in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to relate the invertibility of A to the determinant being non-zero. There is a suggestion to rephrase the problem in terms of calculations involving determinants.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the implications of the determinant being non-zero for both A and ATA. There is recognition that the proof requires showing both directions of the statement. Guidance has been offered to consider the properties of determinants in relation to matrix products.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about theoretical questions and the coherence of their reasoning. There is a mention of struggling with the proof format and clarity in the argumentation.

iamsmooth
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that asquare matrix A is invertible if nad only if ATA is invertible


Homework Equations


Hmm, can't think of any. A A-1 = I maybe?


The Attempt at a Solution



I have trouble with these theory questions, so I'm not sure how to approach this.

If something is invertible, that means it's determinant is not 0? So does it have something to do with that?

Thanks :o
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you aren't good at "theory" questions, then try rephrasing them as "calculation" questions!

If something is invertible, that means it's determinant is not 0?
And vice versa as well, right? If the determinant is not zero, then it's invertible. So we have an identity:
{X is invertible} = {det X is not zero}​

What happens if you substitute this into the original question? (There are two things to substitute! Do both!) Is it something that you can solve by doing two calculations?
 


A square matrix A is invertible if and only if ATA is invertible

Well, If A is invertible, then det(A) is not 0.

det(A) = det(AT)

The poduct of two invertible matrices is invertible

So therefore ATA is invertible if and only if A is invertible.

This doesn't seem like proof, nor does it seem coherent :( I suck
 


You have the right idea but try to show both directions separately.
If A is invertible, then det(A) is non zero. So what can you say about det(AAT)?
Similarly, if det(AAT) is non zero, what can you say about det(A)?
(Also remember that det(AB) = det(A)det(B))
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K