Prove limit x approaches 0 of a rational function = ratio of derivatives

FlorenceC
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
If f and g are differentiable functions with f(O) = g(0) = 0 and g'(O) not equal 0, show that

lim f(x) = f'(0)
x->0 g(x) g'(0)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that lim as x→a f(a) = f(a) if function is continuous. since its differentiable it's continuous. so lim x→0 f(x) = f(0). and lim x→0 g(x) = g(0) but you can't have a 0/0.
I have so idea how to get to the derivative part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FlorenceC said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
If f and g are differentiable functions with f(O) = g(0) = 0 and g'(O) not equal 0, show that

lim f(x) = f'(0)
x->0 g(x) g'(0)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that lim as x→a f(a) = f(a) if function is continuous. since its differentiable it's continuous. so lim x→0 f(x) = f(0). and lim x→0 g(x) = g(0) but you can't have a 0/0.
I have so idea how to get to the derivative part.

This is essentially a special case of L'Hospital's rule. Do you know the Mean Value Theorem?
 
PeroK said:
This is essentially a special case of L'Hospital's rule. Do you know the Mean Value Theorem?
Yes. but how does mvt apply? we didn't learn lhopitals rule yet.
 
FlorenceC said:
Yes. but how does mvt apply? we didn't learn lhopitals rule yet.

Actually, you don't even need the MVT. Just think about the definition of a derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes gopher_p and GFauxPas
This is one of those cases where adding zero back into the expression makes it more clear:
##\lim_{a\to 0} f(a) = \lim_{a\to 0} f(0+a)-f(0) ## ...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top