Prove of Statement, Calculus, Basic Properties of numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of inequalities involving fractions and their relationship to the signs of the numbers involved. Participants explore the implications of the statement that if \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), then both \(a\) and \(b\) must either be positive or negative. The conversation includes specific examples and attempts to clarify the reasoning behind these properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if \(ab > 0\), then either both \(a\) and \(b\) are positive or both are negative, and seeks to prove a similar statement for fractions.
  • Another participant suggests that \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\) can be rewritten as \(ab^{-1} > 0\) and applies the previously mentioned property.
  • Concerns are raised about understanding the implications of \(b^{-1}\) and how it relates to the signs of \(b\) and \(x\) in specific examples.
  • A participant expresses confusion about how to derive inequalities from the properties of \(b^{-1}\) and seeks clarification on the relationship between \(b\) and \(b^{-1}\).
  • One participant concludes that if \(b < 0\) leads to a contradiction when assuming \(b^{-1} > 0\), then \(b\) must be positive, suggesting that \(b\) and \(b^{-1}\) share the same sign.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between the signs of \(b\) and \(b^{-1}\), with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of these properties in specific examples. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of fully establishing the proofs sought by the initial poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of properties of numbers without reaching a consensus on the complete proofs. There are unresolved aspects regarding the application of these properties to specific examples and the assumptions involved in the reasoning.

c.teixeira
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
hi there!

If ab > 0, then (a > 0 and b > 0) or (a < 0 and b < 0). This statement I can prove, just with the basic properties of numbers!

Then, 1[itex]/[/itex]b is defined as b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] right?

So, how does one prove that if [itex]\frac{a}{b}[/itex] > 0, then (a > 0 and b > 0) or (a < 0 and b < 0)?

Can you give me the complete proog of that? Thanks!

For example, how does one prove that if [itex]\frac{x+1}{x-1}[/itex] > 0, then

x > 1 or x < -1?

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So [itex]\frac{a}{b}>0[/itex] implies that [itex]ab^{-1}>0[/itex]. Now apply the property you could prove.
 
micromass said:
So [itex]\frac{a}{b}>0[/itex] implies that [itex]ab^{-1}>0[/itex]. Now apply the property you could prove.

So (a > 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] >0) or (a < 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ). That is easy of course, but how do I know what b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] is?

In the example I made, how do I relate the variavle x, with that fact (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0, or (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0?
 
c.teixeira said:
So (a > 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] >0) or (a < 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ). That is easy of course, but how do I know what b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] is?

In the example I made, how do I relate the variavle x, with that fact (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0, or (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0?

I don't understand your problem. Do you mean that you can't prove that b>0 if [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex]??
 
micromass said:
I don't understand your problem. Do you mean that you can't prove that b>0 if [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex]??

No, that is not what I am saying. I clearly understand the ab[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0.

Well, I better just try to explain my self using the example.

So,we have, [itex]\frac{x-1}{x+1}[/itex] > 0 [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] (x-1)(x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0. So [(x-1) > 0 [itex]\vee[/itex] (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ] [itex]\wedge[/itex] [(x-1) < 0 [itex]\vee[/itex] (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ]. Right?

My question is what good is it to know that for example (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ?

How do I relate this with x < something or x > something?

If I was trying to solve this without this without all the ( proof. based on properties), I would just say that if [itex]\frac{x-1}{x+1}[/itex] > 0, then ( x-1) > 0 and ( x+1) > 0( or the other way around).

Is my doubt clear now?

regards,

cteixeira
 
c.teixeira said:
No, that is not what I am saying. I clearly understand the ab[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0.

Regarding my last post.

Actually I think that is it! How can I prove that b > 0 given b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ?
 
If b<0, then from [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex] would follow [itex]bb^{-1}<0[/itex] or 1<0. This is a contradiction. So b>0 (since b=0 is clearly not allowed).
 
micromass said:
If b<0, then from [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex] would follow [itex]bb^{-1}<0[/itex] or 1<0. This is a contradiction. So b>0 (since b=0 is clearly not allowed).

That was exactly my doubt! Thanks, my question is answered!

So, b and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] have always to have the same sign (given any b), right?

Regards,
 
c.teixeira said:
So, b and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] have always to have the same sign (given any b), right?

Right!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K