Prove of Statement, Calculus, Basic Properties of numbers

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
c.teixeira
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
hi there!

If ab > 0, then (a > 0 and b > 0) or (a < 0 and b < 0). This statement I can prove, just with the basic properties of numbers!

Then, 1[itex]/[/itex]b is defined as b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] right?

So, how does one prove that if [itex]\frac{a}{b}[/itex] > 0, then (a > 0 and b > 0) or (a < 0 and b < 0)?

Can you give me the complete proog of that? Thanks!

For example, how does one prove that if [itex]\frac{x+1}{x-1}[/itex] > 0, then

x > 1 or x < -1?

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
micromass said:
So [itex]\frac{a}{b}>0[/itex] implies that [itex]ab^{-1}>0[/itex]. Now apply the property you could prove.

So (a > 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] >0) or (a < 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ). That is easy of course, but how do I know what b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] is?

In the example I made, how do I relate the variavle x, with that fact (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0, or (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0?
 
c.teixeira said:
So (a > 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] >0) or (a < 0 and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ). That is easy of course, but how do I know what b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] is?

In the example I made, how do I relate the variavle x, with that fact (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0, or (x-1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0?

I don't understand your problem. Do you mean that you can't prove that b>0 if [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex]??
 
micromass said:
I don't understand your problem. Do you mean that you can't prove that b>0 if [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex]??

No, that is not what I am saying. I clearly understand the ab[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0.

Well, I better just try to explain my self using the example.

So,we have, [itex]\frac{x-1}{x+1}[/itex] > 0 [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] (x-1)(x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0. So [(x-1) > 0 [itex]\vee[/itex] (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ] [itex]\wedge[/itex] [(x-1) < 0 [itex]\vee[/itex] (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] < 0 ]. Right?

My question is what good is it to know that for example (x+1)[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ?

How do I relate this with x < something or x > something?

If I was trying to solve this without this without all the ( proof. based on properties), I would just say that if [itex]\frac{x-1}{x+1}[/itex] > 0, then ( x-1) > 0 and ( x+1) > 0( or the other way around).

Is my doubt clear now?

regards,

cteixeira
 
c.teixeira said:
No, that is not what I am saying. I clearly understand the ab[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0.

Regarding my last post.

Actually I think that is it! How can I prove that b > 0 given b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] > 0 ?
 
micromass said:
If b<0, then from [itex]b^{-1}>0[/itex] would follow [itex]bb^{-1}<0[/itex] or 1<0. This is a contradiction. So b>0 (since b=0 is clearly not allowed).

That was exactly my doubt! Thanks, my question is answered!

So, b and b[itex]^{-1}[/itex] have always to have the same sign (given any b), right?

Regards,