Prove that a matrix can be reduced to RRE and CRE

Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement



Let ##A## be an ##m \times n## matrix. Show that by means of a finite number of elementary row/column operations ##A## can be reduced to both "row reduced echelon" and "column reduced echelon" matrix ##R##. i.e ##R_{ij} = 0## if ##i \ne j##, ##R_{ii} = 1 ##, ##1 \le i \le r##, ##R_{ii} = 0## if ##i > r##. Also show that ##R = PAQ## where ##P## and ##Q## are invertible ##m\times m## and ##n \times n## matrices respectively.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since I know I can pass ##A## to a row reduced echelon matrix in finite number of operations.
Lets say the row reduced echelon form of ##A## is ##R^{\prime}##. Then ##R^\prime = PA##.

Also since nothing is special about rows, therefore I can say that a matrix can be passed on to column reduced echelon in finite number of steps. Therefore I can pass ##R^\prime## to a column reduced form ##R## in finite number of steps. Let's say ##R = QR^\prime##

From above I can say ##A## can be passed to a column and row reduced echelon form in finite number of steps and ##R = QPA##.

Is this correct ? I think it is wrong since I used a lot of words and also I got ##R = QPA## not ##R = PAQ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:

Homework Statement



Let ##A## be an ##m \times n## matrix. Show that by means of a finite number of elementary row/column operations ##A## can be reduced to both "row reduced echelon" and "column reduced echelon" matrix ##R##. i.e ##R_{ij} = 0## if ##i \ne j##, ##R_{ii} = 1 ##, ##1 \le i \le r##, ##R_{ii} = 0## if ##i > r##. Also show that ##R = PAQ## where ##P## and ##Q## are invertible ##m\times m## and ##n \times n## matrices respectively.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since I know I can pass ##A## to a row reduced echelon matrix in finite number of operations.
Lets say the row reduced echelon form of ##A## is ##R^{\prime}##. Then ##R^\prime = PA##.

Also since nothing is special about rows, therefore I can say that a matrix can be passed on to column reduced echelon in finite number of steps. Therefore I can pass ##R^\prime## to a column reduced form ##R## in finite number of steps. Let's say ##R = QR^\prime##

From above I can say ##A## can be passed to a column and row reduced echelon form in finite number of steps and ##R = QPA##.

Is this correct ? I think it is wrong since I used a lot of words and also I got ##R = QPA## not ##R = PAQ##.

So, you can have ##R = QPA,## and this can be written as ##R = P_1 A Q_1##, where ##P_1 = QP## and ##Q_1 = I## (the ##n \times n## identity matrix).
 
Ray Vickson said:
So, you can have ##R = QPA,## and this can be written as ##R = P_1 A Q_1##, where ##P_1 = QP## and ##Q_1 = I## (the ##n \times n## identity matrix).

Then the proof is correct ?
 
Buffu said:
Then the proof is correct ?

What proof? All you did was make statements; you did not really "prove" anything.
 
Ray Vickson said:
What proof? All you did was make statements; you did not really "prove" anything.

No I did not get what you are saying. Isn't statements like " You can pass from from A to a row/column reduced form in finite steps " is proven to be true.
So I just need to combine these types of statements to form a proof.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top