Prove that every real number x in [0,1] has a decimal expansion.

robertjordan
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that every real number x in [0,1] has a decimal expansion.


Homework Equations



Let x\in{[0,1]}, then the decimal expansion for x is an infinite sequence (k_{i})^{\infty}_{i=1} such that for all i, k_i is an integer between 0 and 9 and such that x\in\left[\frac{k_1}{10}+\frac{k_2}{10^2}+\cdots +\frac{k_n}{10^n},\frac{k_1}{10} +\frac{k_2}{10^2}+ \cdots +\frac{k_{n}+1}{10^n}\right].

We call that interval above I_{k_1,k_2,\ldots,k_n}

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume BWOC that there exists a real number t\in[0,1] with no decimal expansion. That means there exists an N\in{\mathbb{Z}} such that for all sequences (k_{i})^{N}_{i=1}, t{\notin}\left[\frac{k_1}{10}+\frac{k_2}{10^2}+\cdots +\frac{k_N}{10^N},\frac{k_1}{10}+ \frac{k_2}{10^2}+ \cdots +\frac{k_{N}+1}{10^N}\right].

But I_{0,0,\ldots,0}\cup I_{0,0,\ldots,0,1} \cup I_{0,0,\ldots,0,2} \cup \cdots \cup I_{9,9,9,\ldots,9} = [0,1]
(That big string of unions is supposed to denote breaking up [0,1] into the union of intervals of size 10-N, but I didn't know how exactly to write it... you get the idea though.)

So t{\notin}I_{0,0,\ldots,0}\wedge t{\notin}I_{0,0,\ldots,0,1} \wedge t{\notin}I_{0,0,\ldots,0,2} \wedge \cdots \wedge t{\notin}I_{9,9,9,\ldots,9} implies t{\notin}[0,1], which is a contradiction.



How does this look? Advice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be careful with the negation. "For all x exists a sequence such that for all i [...]" negated is "There is a t without a sequence such that for all i [...]", or "There is a t such that for all sequences, there is an i where [...] is wrong."
The problem here: Those intervals for different i are not independent. If you consider some specific i, it is possible to find an appropriate interval, sure. But that restricts the intervals for other i. The proof is still possible, but you have to take care of this. You could consider the first i where t is not in the interval, for example - if there are i with that property, there is a first one as well.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Replies
33
Views
8K
2
Replies
56
Views
10K
Back
Top