Prove that f is continuous on (a, b), with a property given?

LilTaru
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the function f has the property that |f(x) - f(t)| <= |x - t| for each pair of points x,t in the interval (a, b). Prove that f is continuous on (a, b).


Homework Equations



I know a function is continuous if lim x-->c f(x) = f(c)


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to even start this question. I know a function is continuous on an open interval if it is continuous for all interior points, but how do I even begin to show that? Please help?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need to prove that \displaytype\lim_{x\to x_0} f(x)= f(x_0) for any x_0 in (a, b). That, from the basic definition of limit, is the same as showing that "Given \epsilon&gt; 0, there exist \delta&gt; 0 such that if |x- x_0|&lt; \delta then |f(x)- f(x_0)|&lt; \epsilon".

But you are given that |f(x)- f(x_0)|&lt; |x- x_0|! Taking \delta= \epsilon works.
 
Two questions:

1) So I can replace t with x0? As in instead of |f(x) - f(t)| like the question states... use |f(x) - f(x0|?

2) Why is it en? I thought it is just supposed to be < e?
 
That's epsilon followed by closing quotation marks, not e^n
 
LilTaru said:
Two questions:

1) So I can replace t with x0? As in instead of |f(x) - f(t)| like the question states... use |f(x) - f(x0|?
You said "|f(x) - f(t)| <= |x - t| for each pair of points x,t in the interval (a, b)" and x_0 is a point in (a, b)

2) Why is it en? I thought it is just supposed to be < e?
Thanks, Char. Limit, yes, that is not an 'n' it is just an end of the " ".
 
Oh, okay! That clears it up a lot! It works and I solved it! Thank you both for the very quick responses and help! Much appreciated!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top