Prove that f is not integrable on [0,1]

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


Let ##f(0) = 0## and ##f(x) = 1/x ## if ##0 < x \leqslant 1##. Show that ##f## is not integrable on ##[0,1]##.
Hint: Show that the first term in the Riemann sum, ##f(x_1^*) ~\Delta x##, can be made arbitrarily large

Homework Equations


Definition of integral using Riemann sum

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the definition, we have $$\int_0^1 f(x) dx = \lim_{n \to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i^*) \Delta x $$ Now I am not sure how the hint could be used here. Should I try to go for a proof by contradiction ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
how the hint could be used here
You need to consider specific choices for x1 and pick corresponding values for x1*.
 
If we divide ##[0,1]## into ##n## intervals, then ##\Delta x = \frac{1}{n}## and the first interval would be ##[x_0, x_1] = [0, \frac{1}{n}]##. If we take ##x_1^*## to be right endpoint of the interval, then ##f(x_1^*) = 1/(1/n) = n## and hence ##f(x_1^*)\Delta x = 1## How can this be made arbitrarily large ?
 
Nvm, didn't notice your last post :/
The definition of the Riemann integral eventually hinges on a limit. Specifically when all of your segments' width goes to zero. In this case, though, the tighter you pick your partition, the larger the sum will become, unbounded. Resulting series diverges.
 
Last edited:
IssacNewton said:
If we divide ##[0,1]## into ##n## intervals, then ##\Delta x = \frac{1}{n}## and the first interval would be ##[x_0, x_1] = [0, \frac{1}{n}]##. If we take ##x_1^*## to be right endpoint of the interval, then ##f(x_1^*) = 1/(1/n) = n## and hence ##f(x_1^*)\Delta x = 1## How can this be made arbitrarily large ?

The hint looks like a hindrance to me. Try looking at the Riemann sum for ##n##, not just one term.
 
PeroK said:
The hint looks like a hindrance to me. Try looking at the Riemann sum for ##n##, not just one term.
True, but...
IssacNewton said:
How can this be made arbitrarily large ?
So pick a different x1*.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top