Prove that f(x)>=0 for all x in R iff b^2-ac=<0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robb
  • Start date Start date
Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


upload_2019-1-22_16-53-8.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


This is where I'm at and I'm not sure what my next step is. Any help would be much appreciated!
upload_2019-1-22_16-56-41.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-22_16-53-8.png
    upload_2019-1-22_16-53-8.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 621
  • upload_2019-1-22_16-56-41.png
    upload_2019-1-22_16-56-41.png
    24.7 KB · Views: 656
Physics news on Phys.org
Robb said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 237693

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


This is where I'm at and I'm not sure what my next step is. Any help would be much appreciated!
View attachment 237695

Great work so far! You made a sign mistake at the last equality though.

You want that ##f(x) \geq 0## for all ##x \in \mathbb{R}##, or equivalently (why??) ##\min f = \frac{-b^2 +ac}{a} \geq 0##. Can you proceed? Note that the hypothesis ##a>0## is essential to proceed.
 
This is where I'm not sure. I tried setting min f = (-b^2+ac)/a and solving for x but I'm not sure if that tells me anything and it doesn't relate to the hypothesis. I guess I'm unsure of how to use the hypothesis.
 
Robb said:
This is where I'm not sure. I tried setting min f = (-b^2+ac)/a and solving for x but I'm not sure if that tells me anything and it doesn't relate to the hypothesis. I guess I'm unsure of how to use the hypothesis.

That expression doesn't depend on ##x##...

It really is one line to get the right answer from here.
 
Does it have to do with divisibility of a, which must be greater that zero?
 
Robb said:
Does it have to do with divisibility of a, which must be greater that zero?

Yes, certainly.

When is the following statement true?

##ax \geq 0 \iff x \geq 0##
 
for all x in R?
 
Robb said:
for all x in R?

I forgot to mention that ##x \in \mathbb{R}## is fixed. I want a condition for ##a##.
 
(a) must be greater than zero but that's a given
 
  • #10
Robb said:
(a) must be greater than zero but that's a given

Yes, indeed. Apply this and you will be done (in fact, you have to apply it to ##1/a## instead of ##a##)
 
  • #11
How does b^2-ac =< 0 tell us that f(x) >= 0?
 
  • #12
Robb said:
How does b^2-ac =< 0 tell us that f(x) >= 0?

##b^2 - ac \leq 0 \implies \frac{ac -b^2}{a} \geq 0##

Since ##\frac{ac -b^2}{a} = \min f##, we know that ##\min f \geq 0##. It is now obvious that ##f \geq 0##, as ##f \geq \min f \geq 0##
 
  • #13
NOW I GET IT! I was looking at min f as f' min. I assume I could also apply the second derivative test for extrema? So, f" = 2a, and we know a>0, hence f is positive?
 
Back
Top