Prove that tensor is second rank mixed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that E^alpha_beta is a mixed second rank tensor given the relationship V^alpha = E^alpha_beta * U^beta, where V^alpha and U^beta are contravariant vectors. The key conclusion is that the invariance of the equation under coordinate transformations necessitates that E follows the transformation properties of a mixed second rank tensor. Additionally, the arbitrariness of the vectors V and U is crucial for establishing the validity of the tensor's mixed rank.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contravariant vectors
  • Familiarity with tensor transformation properties
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in tensor calculus
  • Basic concepts of invariance and covariance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of mixed second rank tensors in detail
  • Learn about coordinate transformations for contravariant vectors
  • Explore the concept of invariance in tensor equations
  • Review examples of tensor equations in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in physics and mathematics, particularly those studying tensor analysis, general relativity, or advanced mechanics.

Mcfly11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



V^alpha and U^beta are both contravariant vectors, and obey the equation V^alpha=E^alpha_beta*U^beta. Show that E^alpha_beta is a mixed second rank tensor. (Note: I couldn't get the latex to work, my apologies for the ugly equations. E^alpha_beta means E with a superscript alpha, and subscript beta.)

Homework Equations


The transformation equation of mixed second rank tensors (kind of a bummer to type without the latex working for me...)

The Attempt at a Solution



The only solution I can come up with assumes that the equation is invariant under coordinate transformation...which doesn't seem valid to me. Basically, I transformed the two vectors V and U into 'barred' coordinates using the standard transformation for contravariant vectors, and substitute that into the equation given...then if the form of the equation is to remain invariant under coordinate transformations, it required that E follows the transformation properties of a second rank mixed tensor. I assume this is altogether invalid due to my assumption of invariance...can anyone offer me a starting point or a tip? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You reasoning is correct. You need to use two things: invariance (or covariance, if you wish), and arbitrariness of V and U. You did not mention the second condition and it was not explicitly stated in the problem. But evidently if that equation should hold only for, say, U=0, V=0, then you would not be able to say anything reasonable about E,
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K