Prove that y(x) has finitely many positive zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter drawar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive Zero
drawar
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given $$y''+e^{-x}y=0. \qquad (*)$$ Let ##y(x)## be any nontrivial solution of ##(*)##, show that y has finitely many positive zeros.
Hint: Consider ##z''+\frac{C}{x^4}z=0## where ##C>0## is sufficiently large, which has a solution ##z(x)=x\sin \frac{\sqrt C}{x}##.

Homework Equations


1. (Sturm's Comparison Theorem)
Let y(x) and z(x) be nontrivial solutions of
$$y'' + q(x)y = 0$$
and
$$z'' + r(x)z = 0, $$
where q(x) and r(x) are positive functions such that q(x) > r(x). Then y(x) vanishes at least once between any two successive zeros of z(x).
2. Moreover, if there exists a constant ##m>0## such that ##q(x) \geq m^2## for all x, then y(x) has infinitely many zeros.

The Attempt at a Solution


My guess is ##C## must be big enough s.t ##\frac{C}{x^4}>e^{-x}##, so we can make use of the theorem. I also think that a proof by contradiction (i.e. suppose y has infinitely many positive zeros) may be useful, but don't know how to proceed further from here.
Could anyone shed some light on it please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attempt looks good so far.

"Then y(x) vanishes at least once between any two successive zeros of z(x). "

As you use q(x) > r(x), q(r) will be your C/x^4 and r(x) will be e^(-x).
Therefore, your contradiction starts with "assume ##z'' + r(x)z = 0## has infinitely many zeroes [...]"
And then use the known solution for the other case to get a contradiction.That is a nice theorem.
 
mfb said:
Your attempt looks good so far.

"Then y(x) vanishes at least once between any two successive zeros of z(x). "

As you use q(x) > r(x), q(r) will be your C/x^4 and r(x) will be e^(-x).
Therefore, your contradiction starts with "assume ##z'' + r(x)z = 0## has infinitely many zeroes [...]"
And then use the known solution for the other case to get a contradiction.


That is a nice theorem.
Right, but noting that y and z in the problem statement have reversed roles from the y and z in the theorem statement.
Also, it doesn't quite get you there because sin(1/x) has infinitely many positive zeroes. You might need to split the range of x into (0, ε) and [ε, ∞).
 
Thank you for the help, but doesn't sin(1/x) have infinitely many zeros in [ε, ∞)?
 
drawar said:
Thank you for the help, but doesn't sin(1/x) have infinitely many zeros in [ε, ∞)?
I don't think so. Can you find any in (1/π, ∞)?
 
Oh that's enlightening, thank you!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top