Prove the boundary of rationals is real

  • Thread starter Thread starter kekido
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the boundary of the set of rational numbers, denoted as bd(Q), is equal to the set of real numbers, R. Participants clarify the definitions of "boundary" and "boundary point," emphasizing that a boundary point must have neighborhoods containing both rational and irrational numbers. The conclusion drawn is that since every neighborhood around any real number contains both rationals and irrationals, it follows that the boundary of the rationals is indeed the entire set of real numbers, formally stated as ∂(Q) = R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and topology concepts, specifically "boundary" and "boundary point."
  • Familiarity with the density of rational numbers in the real number line.
  • Knowledge of epsilon-neighborhoods and their properties.
  • Basic mathematical rigor in proofs and definitions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of closure in topology and its relation to boundaries.
  • Explore the properties of dense sets, particularly in the context of real numbers.
  • Learn about epsilon-delta definitions in real analysis.
  • Investigate the implications of boundary points in various topological spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to rational numbers and their boundaries.

kekido
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let Q be the set of all rational numbers
Prove bd(Q)=R

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Let x be a real number, then since the interval |x-r| contains both rationals and irrationals for arbitrary small r, so R is the boundary of Q. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Slow down a bit. What, exactly, is the definition of "boundary" and "boundary point". If you can answer that you should be able to answer your own question. (I might point out that, strictly speaking, |x-r| is not an interval, it is a number! You mean either the interval (x-r, x+r) or the set {y| |x-y|< r}.)
 
I would assume that
  • The boundary is the closure minus the interior
  • A point is in the closure if every epsilon-ball around it has non-empty intersection with the set
  • A point is in the interior if there is an epsilon-ball which fits entirely in the set

From these definitions it is quite straightforward to prove what the boundary of |R is, given (or proven) that the rationals are dense.

So kekido, your idea is right, but if you want to do it rigorously you should put a little more work into it (show that it satisfies the definitions yadayada andsoforth).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Slow down a bit. What, exactly, is the definition of "boundary" and "boundary point". If you can answer that you should be able to answer your own question. (I might point out that, strictly speaking, |x-r| is not an interval, it is a number! You mean either the interval (x-r, x+r) or the set {y| |x-y|< r}.)

Ok, here "boundary" is the set of all boundary points, i.e., \partial(Q)=R

You're right, the interval should be like what you said. I was being sloppy here.

Since the boundary point is defined as for every neighbourhood of the point, it contains both points in S and S^c, so here every small interval of an arbitrary real number contains both rationals and irrationals, so \partial(Q)=R and also \partial(Q^c)=R
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K