Prove the following by induction (or otherwise):

  • Thread starter Thread starter seeker101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the expression ⌈(1/2) * (⌈log2 m⌉)^2⌉ is less than m - 1 for m > 64. Participants suggest starting with a base case for the range 64 < m ≤ 128 and then applying mathematical induction to extend the proof to larger ranges that double in size. The importance of using the properties of logarithms and ceiling functions in the proof is emphasized. The goal is to establish the inequality holds for progressively larger values of m. This approach aims to provide a comprehensive proof through induction.
seeker101
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to go about proving that

\left\lceil\frac{1}{2}{\lceil \log m\rceil}^2\right\rceil is less than m-1, for m > 64? (using log to the base 2)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Prove that it's true for 64 < m <= 128, then use induction to show that it's true for ranges that are 2, 4, 8, ... times as large.
 
Much appreciated!
Thank you.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top