Prove Total Kinetic Energy of a Rotating System about 3 Axes

  • Thread starter Thread starter pardesi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove the total kinetic energy of a rotating system about three perpendicular axes, the equation T = (I_xω_x²)/2 + (I_yω_y²)/2 + (I_zω_z²)/2 is established. The kinetic energy can also be expressed as T = (1/2)∭ρ(ṡx² + ṡy² + ṡz²)dx dy dz, where the translational velocity is related to rotation through v = rω. By rearranging the results, the integral definitions of the moment of inertia appear, leading to T = (1/2)∑I_ijω_iω_j. The inertia tensor can be diagonalized to simplify the expression, and the relationship between rotational and translational velocities is crucial in this derivation. This approach highlights the importance of understanding the inertia tensor and its components in calculating the total kinetic energy of a rotating system.
pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
how does one prove this
if a system is rotating about three different perpendicular axes then
total kinetic energy of the system is
T=\frac{I_{x}\omega_{x}^{2}}{2} + \frac{I_{y}\omega_{y}^{2}}{2}+\frac{I_{z}\omega_{z}^{2}}{2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the body as a set of particles.

T = \frac{1}{2}\iiint \rho (\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 + \dot z^2) dx\,dy\,dz

Then write the translational velocity at (x,y,z) in terms of the rotation velocities and the position (the 3-D version of v = r\omega).

Rearrange the result and the integrals that define I_x etc will appear.
 
well, in general you'll find:
<br /> T=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j}I_{ij}\omega_i\omega_j<br />
then you can change coordinates to diagonalize the I tensor... or, if you made a good choice to begin with the tensor will already be diagonal giving you the expression you want.
 
AlephZero said:
...(the 3-D version of v = r\omega).
I.e.
<br /> \vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r<br />
or
<br /> v_i = \epsilon_{ijk}\omega_j r_k<br />

And use the definition
<br /> I_{ij}=\int\rho\left(<br /> r^2\delta_{ij}-r_ir_j<br /> \right)<br />
 
pardesi said:
how does one prove this
if a system is rotating about three different perpendicular axes then
total kinetic energy of the system is
T=\frac{I_{x}\omega_{x}^{2}}{2} + \frac{I_{y}\omega_{y}^{2}}{2}+\frac{I_{z}\omega_{z}^{2}}{2}
I think you can start with the given that:

KE = \frac{1}{2}I|\vec\omega|^2

What is the square of the length of the vector \omega in terms of the x, y and z components?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
I think you can start with the given that:

KE = \frac{1}{2}I|\vec\omega|^2

What is the square of the length of the vector \omega in terms of the x, y and z components?

AM

no. he can't start with that. Only in the special case of
<br /> I_x=I_y=I_z=I<br />
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top