Prove two polynomials are equal in R^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter lep11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
lep11
Messages
380
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


The task is to prove that $$\lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{Q_1(x)-Q_2(x)}{\|x\|^k}=0 \implies Q_1=Q_2,$$ where ##Q_1,Q_2## are polynomials of degree ##k## in ##\mathbb{R}^n##.

Homework Equations



$$
\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{a x^\alpha}{\|x\|^n}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}
0 \textrm{ if } |\alpha|>n \\
a \textrm { if } |\alpha|=n \\
\infty \textrm { if } |\alpha|<n \textrm{ and } a\neq 0 \\
0 \textrm{ if } a=0
\end{array}\right.
$$

$$|\alpha|=k=\alpha_1!\alpha_2!\cdot...\cdot\alpha_n!$$

The Attempt at a Solution

Proof by contradiction. Assume that ##Q_{1}\neq{Q_2}## and let's denote ##Q_1(x)-Q_2(x)=F(x)+G(x)## where ##F## is lowest degree (##l##) polynomial and and ##G## contains the rest. Then let's consider the limit $$\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{F(tx)+G(tx)}{\|tx\|^l},$$ where ##b\neq{0}## and ##F(b)\neq{0}##.

$$\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{F(tb)+G(tb)}{\|tb\|^l}=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{G(tb)}{\|tb\|^l}+\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{F(tb)}{\|tb\|^l}=...\neq{0}$$ which is contradiction. Therefore it must hold that ##Q_1=Q_2##.I have problem expanding the limit expression.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you can split up the limit that way?
If yes (which is not trivial), you can just split it into k+1 limits and show that every term of the polynomial has to be zero.

I would look for all polynomials of degree <= k which satisfy the given limit. The difference between two polynomials of degree k has to be such a polynomial.
 
lep11 said:
##Q_1,Q_2## are polynomials of degree ##k## in ##\mathbb{R}^n##.

What does "in ##\mathbb{R}^n##" mean in this context? Are we talking about polynomials in n-variables ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
What does "in ##\mathbb{R}^n##" mean in this context? Are we talking about polynomials in n-variables ?
Yes.
##F(tb)=t^{\alpha}F(b)##, but how to use that?
Is ##||tb||^l=|t|^l||b||##?

$$\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{F(tb)+G(tb)}{\|tb\|^l}=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{t^lF(b)+t{^\alpha}G(b)}{|t|^l\|b\|^l}=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}(\frac{t^lF(b)}{|t|^l\|b\|^l}+\frac{t{^\alpha}G(b)}{|t|^l\|b\|^l})=...?$$, where ##|\alpha|>l##
Or
$$\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{F(tb)+G(tb)}{\|tb\|^l}=(\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{a(tb)^l}{\|tb\|^l}+\frac{a(tb)^{\alpha}}{\|tb\|^l})=a+\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{a(tb)^{\alpha}}{\|tb\|^l}=a+0\neq{0}$$ for some ##a_i##?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top