Proving a a pitchfork bifurcation: modified swift-hohenberg

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving question 4.12 from Cross and Greenside, focusing on the modified Swift-Hohenberg equation and its bifurcation characteristics. The equation involves a pitchfork bifurcation when transitioning from a stable trivial solution at r<0 to an unstable state at r>0. Participants are attempting to derive the amplitude equation for the coefficients a_n using a Fourier series approach, but face challenges in evaluating the sums involved. Clarification is sought on how to properly handle the infinite series for squared and cubed terms to demonstrate the bifurcation's nature and establish conditions for supercriticality based on g_2. Overall, the goal is to show that the bifurcation retains its pitchfork character while addressing the complexities introduced by g_2.
onanox
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve question 4.12 from Cross and Greenside "pattern formation and dynamics in nonequilibrium systems".

the question is about the equation

\partial_t u = r u - (\partial_x ^2 +1)^2 u - g_2 u - u^3
Part A: with the ansatz u=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n cos(nx) show that the bifurcation retains its pitchfork character and calculate a_1 to lowest order in r.

Part B: Find a condition on g_2 for the bifurcation to be supercritical

Background: The swift-hohenberg equation (g_2=0) has a uniform solution for r&lt;0 and undergoes a pitchfork bifurcation when r&gt;0 to a stationary nonlinear striped state. The question is asking about generalizing this for g_2\neq 0.

Attempt at solution: I tried plugging in the ansatz into the equation and requiring that \partial_t=0 to find a stationary state, but got caught up in evaluating \left[\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n cos(nx) \right]^2. I tried looking back to see how the bifurcation was analyzed in the g_2=0 case, and there, we assume a single Fourier mode, find an amplitude equation and its easy to deduce that |A|\propto |r|^{1/2} giving the pitchfork bifurcation.

I think I'm supposed to derive a similar relationship for a_1, but I don't know how to evaluate the square and cube of that infinite sum.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Yes, coming back to it I worded in a confusing way. Let me try to clear it up.

The equation has the trivial solution u=0. If you linearize the equation, you find that for r&lt;0 this solution is linearly stable, its linearly unstable for r&gt;0. The question concerns the form of this bifurcation. For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitchfork_bifurcationI think I need to find some set of equations for the a_i, and show that there are two solutions (pitchfork) only when the trivial solution is unstable. But I don't know how to solve that. Effectively, the problem is reduced to evaluating \left[ \sum_{n=0} ^\infty a_n cos(nx)\right]^M for M=2,3
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top