Proving a Trigonometric Identity

AI Thread Summary
To prove the identity (1-sinx)/(1+sinx) = (secx-tanx)^2, the right-hand side is expanded to (secx-tanx)^2 = [(1-sinx)/cosx]^2, leading to (1-2sinx+sinx^2)/(1-sinx^2). The discussion highlights the use of the identity (1-a^2)=(1+a)(1-a) to simplify the expression. By recognizing common terms and applying the Pythagorean identity, the left-hand side is shown to equal the right-hand side. The verification process concludes successfully, confirming the identity.
LordofDirT
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Im supposed to verify that (1-sinx)/(1+sinx) = (secx-tanx)^2

RHS = (secx-tanx)^2 = (1/cosx - sinx/cosx)^2 = [(1-sinx) / cosx]^2

= [(1-sinx)(1-sinx)]/cosx^2 = (1-2sinx+sinx^2)/(1-sinx^2)

From here, I'm feeling pretty confused. I'm not even sure if all my values are correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From there it's important to recognize that (1-a^2)=(1+a)(1-a) and then (1-2a-a^2)=(1-a)^2=(1-a)(1-a). Then it's just a matter of removing the common term.

-------------------------------
theUndergrad

http://www.theUndergraduateJournal.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok,

starting from: [(1-sinx) / cosx]^2 = [(1-sinx)(1-sinx)]/cosx^2

using pythagorean identity

[(1-sinx)/(1-sinx)]/(1-sinx^2) = [(1-sinx)/(1-sinx)]/[(1-sinx)(1+sinx)] = (1-sinx)/(1+sinx) = RHS

Thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top