Proving aX is in U if X is in Rn and U is Subspace of Rn

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
Let U be a subspace of Rn

If aX is in U, where a is non zero number and X is in Rn, show that X is in U

THis seems so obvious... but i m not sure how to show this by a proof

aX is in U and aX is in Rn for sure and U is a subspace of Rn.
Is it true that if U is closed under scalar multiplication then X is in U ?

Please advise!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it true that if U is closed under scalar multiplication then X is in U ?

Yes. And why is U closed under scalar multiplication?
 
Muzza said:
Yes. And why is U closed under scalar multiplication?


Ohh, me sir! Is it by any chance to do with the definition of what a subspace is?
 
And, by the way, why is it important that a be non-zero? What property do non-zero numbers have that zero does not?
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top