fmilano
- 7
- 0
Hi, I need to show this:
b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2
given these three conditions:
b_m \geq b_i, for i=1..n (in other words b_m = max(b_i)) and
0 \leq b_i \leq 1 for i=1..n and
\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1
I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated
(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).
Thanks,
Federico
b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2
given these three conditions:
b_m \geq b_i, for i=1..n (in other words b_m = max(b_i)) and
0 \leq b_i \leq 1 for i=1..n and
\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1
I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated
(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).
Thanks,
Federico