Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 Under Given Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter fmilano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
AI Thread Summary
To prove that b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under the specified conditions, it is established that b_m is the maximum of the b_i values, which are constrained between 0 and 1, and their sum equals 1. The inequality ∑b_i^2 ≤ ∑b_i = 1 holds true since each b_i^2 is less than or equal to b_i. This leads to the conclusion that b_m, being the maximum value, must be greater than or equal to the sum of the squares of the b_i values. Thus, the desired inequality b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 is supported by these conditions.
fmilano
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to show this:

b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2

given these three conditions:

b_m \geq b_i, for i=1..n (in other words b_m = max(b_i)) and

0 \leq b_i \leq 1 for i=1..n and

\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1

I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated

(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).

Thanks,

Federico
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help . . .

0 \leq b_{i}^2 \leq b_i \leq 1, this implies that \sum_{i = 1}^n b_{i}^2 \leq \sum_{i = 1}^n b_i = 1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top