Proving Conservative Force F(x,y): Steps & Examples

AI Thread Summary
To determine if the force F(x,y) = (x² + 3y + 11)î + (3x + 5y³ + 11)ĵ is conservative, one must calculate the curl of the vector field. The curl is derived from the vector differential operator and involves a determinant that incorporates the components of F. There is confusion regarding the distinction between gradient and curl, as they are fundamentally different operations. The discussion highlights a lack of resources in the textbook for handling forces expressed in vector notation, leading to frustration among participants. Understanding the correct application of these mathematical concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
KaiserBrandon
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that the force F(x,y) = (x^{2}+3y+11)\widehat{x} + (3x +5y^{3}+11)\widehat{y} is conservative

Homework Equations


it's conservative if \nabla X F = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


ok, I know how to take the gradient of a function like F(x,y) = x^2 + 3xy + 3 + y, but I'm not sure how to take the gradient of the function for this question. I've tried many things, including taking the partial derivative of x within the brackets next to the x unit vector, and the partial derivative of y within the brackets next to the y unit vector.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbf{\nabla}\times\textbf{F} represents the curl of \textbf{F}, not the gradient. I'm sure your textbook covers how to calculate a curl, so I suggest you open it up and read that section.
 
yes I know it represents the curl. I know how to find the curl if I have the gradient. But I'm stuck on the part where you have to find the gradient
 
Gradient and curl are two very different types of derivatives. The gradient takes a scalar function as input and outputs a vector function. The curl takes a vector function as input and outputs a vector function. You do not calculate the curl by first calculating the gradient.

You seem very confused on how to calculate the curl of a vector field, so again, I recommend you open your textbook and read the section on curls.
 
the curl is a cross product between the gradient of the force and the force itself. The textbook only tells me how to find the curl given a force in the form of say F(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 + 2, where the finding the gradient is straightforward, and so is using that to find the curl. however, for this question, the force is given in terms of
\widehat{x}, \widehat{y}
I don't know how to do it using a force given in this way, and my textbook nor the class notes have any information either. And I can't find anything on the internet either.
 
KaiserBrandon said:
the curl is a cross product between the gradient of the force and the force itself.

No, it isn't. The gradient of a vector, like \textbf{F}, would be a second rank tensor (or matrix)...how exactly would you compute the cross product of a tensor/matrix with a vector?

The curl of \textbf{F} is the cross product of the vector differential operator \mathbf{\nabla}=\hat{\mathbf{x}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{\mathbf{y}}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\partial}{\partial z} (often called the "Del operator" or "nabla operator") with \textbf{F}. It can be represented by the following determinant:

\mathbf{\nabla}\times\textbf{F}=\begin{vmatrix}\hat{\mathbf{x}} & \hat{\mathbf{y}} & \hat{\mathbf{z}} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ F_x & F_y & F_z\end{vmatrix}=\left( \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial z}\right)\hat{\mathbf{x}}+\left( \frac{\partial F_x}{\partial z}- \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial x}\right)\hat{\mathbf{y}}+\left( \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial F_x}{\partial y}\right)\hat{\mathbf{z}}


I don't know how to do it using a force given in this way, and my textbook nor the class notes have any information either. And I can't find anything on the internet either.

I can't believe that. What textbook are you using?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top