Proving Continuous Function: Epsilon-Delta Proof

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
how do i show f(x)=\frac{x}{1-x^2} is a continuous function by means of an \epsilon - \delta proof? oh and x \in (-1,1)

so far i have said:
let \epsilon>0, \exists \delta>0 s.t. |x-x_0|< \delta. now i need to show that |f(x)-f(x_0)|< \epsilon. yes?

can't do the rest of it though...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just say that a delta exists, you need to show that one exists. Assume that you have some positive epsilon. Now work with your inequality involving f(x) and f(x_0) and epsilon, and manipulate this until you get an inequality with x and x_0.
 
its virtually impossible to factorise...

could i just say x is continuous and 1-x^2 is continuous and non zero so f is continuous?
 
It depends on how you are required to show continuity. If you have to give an \epsilon - \delta proof, then that's what you need to do. OTOH, if you have some theorems about continuity you can use, then that would be easier. For example, polynomials are continuous everywhere, and quotients of polynomials are continuous on any interval whose points don't cause the denominator to vanish (become zero). Does that help?
 
Since f(x)= x/(1- x^2),
f(x)- f(x_0)= \frac{x}{1- x^2}- \frac{x_0}{1- x_0^2}
= \frac{x(1-x_0^2)- x_0(1- x^2)}{(1- x^2)(1- x_0^2)}
= \frac{x- xx_0^2- x_0- x^2x_0}{(1- x^2)(1- x_0^2)}
= \frac{(x- x_0)- x_0x(x- x_0)}{(1- x^2)(1- x_0^2)}
= (x- x_0)\frac{1- x_0x}{(1- x^2)(1- x_0^2)}
Now you need to find a bound on
\frac{1- x_0x}{(1- x^2)(1- x_0^2)}

You will, of course, want to stay away form x or x_0 being 1 or -1 so you might do this: Let a be the smaller of |1- x_0| and |-1- x_0|[/tex] and require that |x- x_0|< a/2.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top